why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
Tao, Yintian
Yintian.Tao at amd.com
Mon Apr 20 12:51:11 UTC 2020
Hi Christian
Yes, because only pp_one_vf mode can run RGP. And according to Jacob’s comments,
only when running RGP benchmark then UMD will enable this feature, Otherwise UMD will not enable this feature.
Therefore, Multi-VF will never enter into this case.
Best Regards
Yintian Tao
From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
Sent: 2020年4月20日 20:42
To: Tao, Yintian <Yintian.Tao at amd.com>; Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com>; He, Jacob <Jacob.He at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
Monk needs to answer this, but I don't think that this will work.
This explanation even sounds like only one VF can use the feature at the same time, is that correct?
Regards,
Christian.
Am 20.04.20 um 14:08 schrieb Tao, Yintian:
Hi Monk, Christian
According to the discussion with Jacob offline, UMD will only enable SPM feature when testing RGP.
And under virtualization , only pp_one_vf mode can test RGP.
Therefore, whether we can directly use MMIO to READ/WRITE register for RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL?
Best Regards
Yintian Tao
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org><mailto:amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Liu, Monk
Sent: 2020年4月20日 16:33
To: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com><mailto:Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; He, Jacob <Jacob.He at amd.com><mailto:Jacob.He at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: RE: why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
Christian
What we want to do is like:
Read reg value from RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL to tmp
Set bits:3:0 to VMID to tmp
Write tmp to RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL
I didn’t find any PM4 packet on GFX9/10 can achieve above goal ….
_____________________________________
Monk Liu|GPU Virtualization Team |AMD
[sig-cloud-gpu]
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com<mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 4:03 PM
To: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com<mailto:Monk.Liu at amd.com>>; He, Jacob <Jacob.He at amd.com<mailto:Jacob.He at amd.com>>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com<mailto:Christian.Koenig at amd.com>>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
I would also prefer to update the SPM VMID register using PM4 packets instead of the current handling.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 20.04.20 um 09:50 schrieb Liu, Monk:
I just try to explain what I want to do here, no real patch formalized yet
_____________________________________
Monk Liu|GPU Virtualization Team |AMD
[sig-cloud-gpu]
From: He, Jacob <Jacob.He at amd.com><mailto:Jacob.He at amd.com>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 3:45 PM
To: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com><mailto:Monk.Liu at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com><mailto:Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Do you miss a file which adds spm_updated to vm structure?
________________________________
From: Liu, Monk <Monk.Liu at amd.com<mailto:Monk.Liu at amd.com>>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 3:32 PM
To: He, Jacob <Jacob.He at amd.com<mailto:Jacob.He at amd.com>>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com<mailto:Christian.Koenig at amd.com>>
Cc: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org> <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>>
Subject: why we need to do infinite RLC_SPM register setting during VM flush
Hi Jaco & Christian
As titled , check below patch:
commit 10790a09ea584cc832353a5c2a481012e5e31a13
Author: Jacob He <jacob.he at amd.com<mailto:jacob.he at amd.com>>
Date: Fri Feb 28 20:24:41 2020 +0800
drm/amdgpu: Update SPM_VMID with the job's vmid when application reserves the vmid
SPM access the video memory according to SPM_VMID. It should be updated
with the job's vmid right before the job is scheduled. SPM_VMID is a
global resource
Change-Id: Id3881908960398f87e7c95026a54ff83ff826700
Signed-off-by: Jacob He <jacob.he at amd.com<mailto:jacob.he at amd.com>>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com<mailto:christian.koenig at amd.com>>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 6e6fc8c..ba2236a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -1056,8 +1056,12 @@ int amdgpu_vm_flush(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job,
struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
bool pasid_mapping_needed = false;
unsigned patch_offset = 0;
+ bool update_spm_vmid_needed = (job->vm && (job->vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub] != NULL));
int r;
+ if (update_spm_vmid_needed && adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid)
+ adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, job->vmid);
+
if (amdgpu_vmid_had_gpu_reset(adev, id)) {
gds_switch_needed = true;
vm_flush_needed = true;
this update_spm_vmid() looks an completely overkill to me, we only need to do it once for its VM …
in SRIOV the register reading/writing for update_spm_vmid() is now carried by KIQ thus there is too much burden on KIQ for such unnecessary jobs …
I want to change it to only do it once per VM, like:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 6e6fc8c..ba2236a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -1056,8 +1056,12 @@ int amdgpu_vm_flush(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job,
struct dma_fence *fence = NULL;
bool pasid_mapping_needed = false;
unsigned patch_offset = 0;
+ bool update_spm_vmid_needed = (job->vm && (job->vm->reserved_vmid[vmhub] != NULL));
int r;
+ if (update_spm_vmid_needed && adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid && !vm->spm_updated) {
+ adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, job->vmid);
+ vm->spm_updated = true;
+ }
if (amdgpu_vmid_had_gpu_reset(adev, id)) {
gds_switch_needed = true;
vm_flush_needed = true;
what do you think ?
P.S.: the best way is to let GFX ring itself to do the update_spm_vmid() instead of let CPU doing it, e.g.: we put more PM4 command in VM-FLUSH packets ….
But I prefer the simple way first like I demonstrated above
_____________________________________
Monk Liu|GPU Virtualization Team |AMD
[sig-cloud-gpu]
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cyintian.tao%40amd.com%7C94ed105b251d4c2629cc08d7e5056f39%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637229683834893085&sdata=IJiVlGsX0rL0%2FcTvlSWquG%2F3aufz9R%2FvMlkk%2BpVaQSM%3D&reserved=0>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20200420/00195b77/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12243 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20200420/00195b77/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list