[PATCH v6 12/12] x86/traps: Fix up invalid PASID
Andy Lutomirski
luto at kernel.org
Sat Aug 1 01:28:37 UTC 2020
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 4:48 PM Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu at intel.com> wrote:
>
> A #GP fault is generated when ENQCMD instruction is executed without
> a valid PASID value programmed in the current thread's PASID MSR. The
> #GP fault handler will initialize the MSR if a PASID has been allocated
> for this process.
Let's take a step back here. Why are we trying to avoid IPIs? If you
call munmap(), you IPI other CPUs running tasks in the current mm. If
you do perf_event_open() and thus acquire RDPMC permission, you IPI
other CPUs running tasks in the current mm. If you call modify_ldt(),
you IPI other CPUs running tasks in the current mm. These events can
all happen more than once per process.
Now we have ENQCMD. An mm can be assigned a PASID *once* in the model
that these patches support. Why not just send an IPI using
essentially identical code to the LDT sync or the CR4.PCE sync?
--Andy
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list