[RFC PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: add initial support for pci error handler
Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Thu Aug 13 18:18:33 UTC 2020
On 8/13/20 11:06 AM, Nirmoy wrote:
>
> On 8/13/20 3:38 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>
>> On 8/13/20 7:09 AM, Nirmoy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/12/20 4:52 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/11/20 9:30 AM, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>>>>> This patch will ignore non-fatal errors and try to
>>>>> stop amdgpu's sw stack on fatal errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>>>>> index c1219af2e7d6..2b9ede3000ee 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>>>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/vga_switcheroo.h>
>>>>> #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>>>>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
>>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>>>>> @@ -1516,6 +1517,58 @@ static struct drm_driver kms_driver = {
>>>>> .patchlevel = KMS_DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL,
>>>>> };
>>>>> +static pci_ers_result_t amdgpu_pci_err_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>>> + pci_channel_state_t state)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct drm_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_device *adev = dev->dev_private;
>>>>> + int i;
>>>>> + int ret = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + switch (state) {
>>>>> + case pci_channel_io_normal:
>>>>> + ret = PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + /* Disable power management */
>>>>> + adev->runpm = 0;
>>>>> + /* Suspend all IO operations */
>>>>> + amdgpu_fbdev_set_suspend(adev, 1);
>>>>> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adev->delayed_init_work);
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; ++i) {
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!ring || !ring->sched.thread)
>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + amdgpu_job_stop_all_jobs_on_sched(&ring->sched);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You need to call drm_sched_stop first before calling this
>>>>
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (adev->mode_info.mode_config_initialized) {
>>>>> + if (!amdgpu_device_has_dc_support(adev))
>>>>> + drm_helper_force_disable_all(adev->ddev);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + drm_atomic_helper_shutdown(adev->ddev);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + amdgpu_fence_driver_fini(adev);
>>>>> + amdgpu_fbdev_fini(adev);
>>>>> + /* Try to close drm device to stop applications
>>>>> + * from opening dri files for further IO operations.
>>>>> + * TODO: This will throw warning as ttm is not
>>>>> + * cleaned perperly */
>>>>> + drm_dev_fini(dev);
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think user mode applications might still hold reference to the drm device
>>>> through through drm_dev_get either by directly opening
>>>> the device file or indirectly through importing DMA buff, if so when the
>>>> last of them terminate drm_dev_put->drm_dev_release->...->drm_dev_fini
>>>> might get called again causing use after free e.t.c issues. Maybe better to
>>>> call here drm_dev_put then and so drm_dev_fini will get called when this
>>>> last user client releases his reference.
>>>
>>>
>>> drm_dev_fini() seems to be cleaner. Problem is window manager(sway) never
>>> gets terminated after the AER error and drm files remains active. Simple cat
>>> on dri files
>>>
>>> goes though amdgpu and spits out more errors.
>>
>>
>> What happens if you kill the window manager after you closed drm device with
>> your original code applied ? I would expect drm_dev_fini to be called again
>> for the reason i explained above and this would obviously would be wrong to
>> happen.
>
> Hi Andrey,
>
>
> hmm I quickly tried that, Kernel crashed and later rebooted after sometime. I
> don't have a serial console to check logs and there was no logs afterwards in
> journalctl.
>
> drm_dev_put() had similar behavior, kernel/machine was inaccessible over ssh.
>
>
> Did you face same behavior while testing gpu hotplug ?
>
>
> Nirmoy
Yea, in my case device sysfs structure was removed on pci_remove while when last
user client dropped reference and this led
to drm_dev_fini to be called there were more sysfs entries removal there which
lead to a crash. But here i don't think the sysfs for drm_device
is removed because the device is not extracted...
Andrey
>
>
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also a general question - in my work on DPC recovery feature which tries to
>>>> recover after PCIe error - once the PCI error has happened MMIO registers
>>>> become
>>>> unaccessible for r/w as the PCI link is dead until after the PCI link is
>>>> reset by the DPC driver (see
>>>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/PCI/pci-error-recovery.html section
>>>> 6.1.4).
>>>> Your case is to try and gracefully to close the drm device once fatal error
>>>> happened, didn't you encounter errors or warnings when accessing HW
>>>> registers during any of the operations
>>>> above ?
>>>
>>>
>>> As discussed over chat, it seems aer generated with aer-inject tool just
>>> triggers kernel PCI error APIs but the device is still active so I didn't
>>> encounter any errors when accessing HW registers.
>>>
>>>
>>> Nirmoy
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct pci_error_handlers amdgpu_err_handler = {
>>>>> + .error_detected = amdgpu_pci_err_detected,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +
>>>>> static struct pci_driver amdgpu_kms_pci_driver = {
>>>>> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>>>>> .id_table = pciidlist,
>>>>> @@ -1523,10 +1576,9 @@ static struct pci_driver amdgpu_kms_pci_driver = {
>>>>> .remove = amdgpu_pci_remove,
>>>>> .shutdown = amdgpu_pci_shutdown,
>>>>> .driver.pm = &amdgpu_pm_ops,
>>>>> + .err_handler = &amdgpu_err_handler,
>>>>> };
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> static int __init amdgpu_init(void)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int r;
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list