[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/sriov: Use kiq to copy the gpu clock
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Wed Feb 26 14:29:48 UTC 2020
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 11:34 PM Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com> wrote:
>
> For vega10 sriov, the register is blocked, use
> copy data command to fix the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> index 1c7a16b..71df0d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
> @@ -3963,6 +3963,63 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_soft_reset(void *handle)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static uint64_t amdgpu_kiq_read_clock(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
Please name this function gfx_v9_0_kiq_read_clock for consistency.
> +{
> + signed long r, cnt = 0;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + uint32_t seq;
> + struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &kiq->ring;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!ring->funcs->emit_rreg);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> + amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 32);
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_COPY_DATA, 4));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 9 | /* src: register*/
Is src 9 the counter?
Assuming that is correct, with the naming fixed:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> + (5 << 8) | /* dst: memory */
> + (1 << 16) | /* count sel */
> + (1 << 20)); /* write confirm */
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, lower_32_bits(adev->wb.gpu_addr +
> + kiq->reg_val_offs * 4));
> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, upper_32_bits(adev->wb.gpu_addr +
> + kiq->reg_val_offs * 4));
> + amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(ring, &seq);
> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&kiq->ring_lock, flags);
> +
> + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
> +
> + /* don't wait anymore for gpu reset case because this way may
> + * block gpu_recover() routine forever, e.g. this virt_kiq_rreg
> + * is triggered in TTM and ttm_bo_lock_delayed_workqueue() will
> + * never return if we keep waiting in virt_kiq_rreg, which cause
> + * gpu_recover() hang there.
> + *
> + * also don't wait anymore for IRQ context
> + * */
> + if (r < 1 && (adev->in_gpu_reset || in_interrupt()))
> + goto failed_kiq_read;
> +
> + might_sleep();
> + while (r < 1 && cnt++ < MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY) {
> + msleep(MAX_KIQ_REG_BAILOUT_INTERVAL);
> + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, MAX_KIQ_REG_WAIT);
> + }
> +
> + if (cnt > MAX_KIQ_REG_TRY)
> + goto failed_kiq_read;
> +
> + return (uint64_t)adev->wb.wb[kiq->reg_val_offs] |
> + (uint64_t)adev->wb.wb[kiq->reg_val_offs + 1 ] << 32ULL;
> +
> +failed_kiq_read:
> + pr_err("failed to read gpu clock\n");
> + return ~0;
> +}
> +
> static uint64_t gfx_v9_0_get_gpu_clock_counter(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> {
> uint64_t clock;
> @@ -3970,16 +4027,7 @@ static uint64_t gfx_v9_0_get_gpu_clock_counter(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false);
> mutex_lock(&adev->gfx.gpu_clock_mutex);
> if (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10 && amdgpu_sriov_runtime(adev)) {
> - uint32_t tmp, lsb, msb, i = 0;
> - do {
> - if (i != 0)
> - udelay(1);
> - tmp = RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_REFCLOCK_TIMESTAMP_MSB);
> - lsb = RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_REFCLOCK_TIMESTAMP_LSB);
> - msb = RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_REFCLOCK_TIMESTAMP_MSB);
> - i++;
> - } while (unlikely(tmp != msb) && (i < adev->usec_timeout));
> - clock = (uint64_t)lsb | ((uint64_t)msb << 32ULL);
> + clock = amdgpu_kiq_read_clock(adev);
> } else {
> WREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_CAPTURE_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT, 1);
> clock = (uint64_t)RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, mmRLC_GPU_CLOCK_COUNT_LSB) |
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list