[PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: return EINVAL instead of ENOENT in the VM code
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Wed Jan 22 14:03:02 UTC 2020
That we can't find a PD above the root is expected can only happen if
we try to update a larger range than actually managed by the VM.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
index 5cb182231f5d..8119f32ca94d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_update_ptes(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
* shift we should go up one level and check it again.
*/
if (!amdgpu_vm_pt_ancestor(&cursor))
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -EINVAL;
continue;
}
--
2.14.1
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list