[PATCH 2/6] drm/amdgpu: remove eeprom from the smu i2c handlers
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Tue Jul 21 16:52:36 UTC 2020
The driver uses it for EEPROM access, but it's just an i2c bus.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c | 52 +++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.h | 4 +-
.../drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega20_smumgr.c | 4 +-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c
index f3d0324c4a7f..d55bf64770c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.c
@@ -536,12 +536,12 @@ static bool smu_v11_0_i2c_bus_unlock(struct i2c_adapter *control)
return false;
}
-/***************************** EEPROM I2C GLUE ****************************/
+/***************************** I2C GLUE ****************************/
-static uint32_t smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_read_data(struct i2c_adapter *control,
- uint8_t address,
- uint8_t *data,
- uint32_t numbytes)
+static uint32_t smu_v11_0_i2c_read_data(struct i2c_adapter *control,
+ uint8_t address,
+ uint8_t *data,
+ uint32_t numbytes)
{
uint32_t ret = 0;
@@ -561,10 +561,10 @@ static uint32_t smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_read_data(struct i2c_adapter *control,
return ret;
}
-static uint32_t smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_write_data(struct i2c_adapter *control,
- uint8_t address,
- uint8_t *data,
- uint32_t numbytes)
+static uint32_t smu_v11_0_i2c_write_data(struct i2c_adapter *control,
+ uint8_t address,
+ uint8_t *data,
+ uint32_t numbytes)
{
uint32_t ret;
@@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ static const struct i2c_lock_operations smu_v11_0_i2c_i2c_lock_ops = {
.unlock_bus = unlock_bus,
};
-static int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
+static int smu_v11_0_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
{
int i, ret;
@@ -639,13 +639,13 @@ static int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
if (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
- ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_read_data(i2c_adap,
- (uint8_t)msgs[i].addr,
- msgs[i].buf, msgs[i].len);
+ ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_read_data(i2c_adap,
+ (uint8_t)msgs[i].addr,
+ msgs[i].buf, msgs[i].len);
else
- ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_write_data(i2c_adap,
- (uint8_t)msgs[i].addr,
- msgs[i].buf, msgs[i].len);
+ ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_write_data(i2c_adap,
+ (uint8_t)msgs[i].addr,
+ msgs[i].buf, msgs[i].len);
if (ret != I2C_OK) {
num = -EIO;
@@ -657,18 +657,18 @@ static int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap,
return num;
}
-static u32 smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
+static u32 smu_v11_0_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
{
return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL;
}
-static const struct i2c_algorithm smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_algo = {
- .master_xfer = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_xfer,
- .functionality = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_func,
+static const struct i2c_algorithm smu_v11_0_i2c_algo = {
+ .master_xfer = smu_v11_0_i2c_xfer,
+ .functionality = smu_v11_0_i2c_func,
};
-int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control)
+int smu_v11_0_i2c_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
int res;
@@ -676,8 +676,8 @@ int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control)
control->owner = THIS_MODULE;
control->class = I2C_CLASS_SPD;
control->dev.parent = &adev->pdev->dev;
- control->algo = &smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_i2c_algo;
- snprintf(control->name, sizeof(control->name), "AMDGPU EEPROM");
+ control->algo = &smu_v11_0_i2c_algo;
+ snprintf(control->name, sizeof(control->name), "AMDGPU SMU");
control->lock_ops = &smu_v11_0_i2c_i2c_lock_ops;
res = i2c_add_adapter(control);
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control)
return res;
}
-void smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_fini(struct i2c_adapter *control)
+void smu_v11_0_i2c_control_fini(struct i2c_adapter *control)
{
i2c_del_adapter(control);
}
@@ -715,9 +715,9 @@ bool smu_v11_0_i2c_test_bus(struct i2c_adapter *control)
smu_v11_0_i2c_init(control);
/* Write 0xde to address 0x0000 on the EEPROM */
- ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_write_data(control, I2C_TARGET_ADDR, data, 6);
+ ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_write_data(control, I2C_TARGET_ADDR, data, 6);
- ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_read_data(control, I2C_TARGET_ADDR, data, 6);
+ ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_read_data(control, I2C_TARGET_ADDR, data, 6);
smu_v11_0_i2c_fini(control);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.h
index 973f28d68e70..44467c05f642 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/smu_v11_0_i2c.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
struct i2c_adapter;
-int smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control);
-void smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_fini(struct i2c_adapter *control);
+int smu_v11_0_i2c_control_init(struct i2c_adapter *control);
+void smu_v11_0_i2c_control_fini(struct i2c_adapter *control);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega20_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega20_smumgr.c
index c2e0fbbccf56..d1b7955bb4c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega20_smumgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/vega20_smumgr.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int vega20_smu_init(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
priv->smu_tables.entry[TABLE_ACTIVITY_MONITOR_COEFF].size = sizeof(DpmActivityMonitorCoeffInt_t);
if (adev->psp.ras.ras) {
- ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_init(&adev->pm.smu_i2c);
+ ret = smu_v11_0_i2c_control_init(&adev->pm.smu_i2c);
if (ret)
goto err4;
}
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static int vega20_smu_fini(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
struct amdgpu_device *adev = hwmgr->adev;
if (adev->psp.ras.ras)
- smu_v11_0_i2c_eeprom_control_fini(&adev->pm.smu_i2c);
+ smu_v11_0_i2c_control_fini(&adev->pm.smu_i2c);
if (priv) {
amdgpu_bo_free_kernel(&priv->smu_tables.entry[TABLE_PPTABLE].handle,
--
2.25.4
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list