[PATCH 6/9] drm/amdgpu: schedule ras recovery when reaching bad page threshold
Guchun Chen
guchun.chen at amd.com
Thu Jul 23 08:33:43 UTC 2020
Once the bad page saved to eeprom reaches the configured
threshold, ras recovery will be issued to tell user.
Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen at amd.com>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index 3f1b167afe6b..0cd594c74bff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -395,8 +395,10 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
int i, ret = 0;
struct i2c_msg *msgs, *msg;
unsigned char *buffs, *buff;
+ bool sched_ras_recovery = false;
struct eeprom_table_record *record;
struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
+ struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
if (adev->asic_type != CHIP_VEGA20 && adev->asic_type != CHIP_ARCTURUS)
return 0;
@@ -414,11 +416,29 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
goto free_buff;
}
+ /*
+ * If saved bad pages number exceeds the bad page threshod for
+ * the whole VRAM, update table header to mark one BAD GPU and
+ * schedule one ras recovery after eeprom write is done, this
+ * can avoid the missing for latest records.
+ *
+ * This new header will be picked up and checked in the bootup by
+ * ras recovery, which may break bootup process to notify user this
+ * GPU is bad and to retire such GPU.
+ */
+ if (write && (ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold != 0xFFFFFFFF) &&
+ ((control->num_recs + num) >= ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold)) {
+ dev_warn(adev->dev,
+ "Saved bad pages(%d) reaches threshold value(%d).\n",
+ control->num_recs + num, ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold);
+ control->tbl_hdr.header = EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_BAD;
+ sched_ras_recovery = true;
+ }
+
/* In case of overflow just start from beginning to not lose newest records */
if (write && (control->next_addr + EEPROM_TABLE_RECORD_SIZE * num > EEPROM_SIZE_BYTES))
control->next_addr = EEPROM_RECORD_START;
-
/*
* TODO Currently makes EEPROM writes for each record, this creates
* internal fragmentation. Optimized the code to do full page write of
@@ -494,6 +514,20 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_process_recods(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
__update_tbl_checksum(control, records, num, old_hdr_byte_sum);
__update_table_header(control, buffs);
+
+ if (sched_ras_recovery) {
+ /*
+ * Before scheduling ras recovery, assert the related
+ * flag first, which shall bypass common bad page
+ * reservation execution in amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu.
+ */
+ amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev)->flags |=
+ AMDGPU_RAS_FLAG_SKIP_BAD_PAGE_RESV;
+
+ dev_warn(adev->dev, "Conduct ras recovery due to bad "
+ "page threshold reached.\n");
+ amdgpu_ras_reset_gpu(adev);
+ }
} else if (!__validate_tbl_checksum(control, records, num)) {
DRM_WARN("EEPROM Table checksum mismatch!");
/* TODO Uncomment when EEPROM read/write is relliable */
--
2.17.1
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list