[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: hold the reference of finished fence
Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Tue Mar 24 14:52:28 UTC 2020
This is only for the guilty job which was removed from the
ring_mirror_list due to completion and hence will not be resubmitted by
recovery and will not be freed by the usual flow in
drm_sched_get_cleanup_job (see drm_sched_stop)
Andrey
On 3/24/20 10:45 AM, Pan, Xinhui wrote:
>
> [AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
>
>
> Does this issue occur when gpu recovery?
> I just check the code, fence timedout will free job and put its
> fence. but gpu recovery might resubmit job.
> Correct me if I am wrong.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of
> Andrey Grodzovsky <Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 24, 2020 11:40:06 AM
> *To:* Tao, Yintian <Yintian.Tao at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian
> <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> *Cc:* amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: hold the reference of finished fence
>
> On 3/23/20 10:22 AM, Yintian Tao wrote:
> > There is one one corner case at dma_fence_signal_locked
> > which will raise the NULL pointer problem just like below.
> > ->dma_fence_signal
> > ->dma_fence_signal_locked
> > ->test_and_set_bit
> > here trigger dma_fence_release happen due to the zero of fence refcount.
>
>
> Did you find out why the zero refcount on the finished fence happens
> before the fence was signaled ? The finished fence is created with
> refcount set to 1 in drm_sched_fence_create->dma_fence_init and then the
> refcount is decremented in
> drm_sched_main->amdgpu_job_free_cb->drm_sched_job_cleanup. This should
> only happen after fence is already signaled (see
> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job). On top of that the finished fence is
> referenced from other places (e.g. entity->last_scheduled e.t.c)...
>
>
> >
> > ->dma_fence_put
> > ->dma_fence_release
> > ->drm_sched_fence_release_scheduled
> > ->call_rcu
> > here make the union fled “cb_list” at finished fence
> > to NULL because struct rcu_head contains two pointer
> > which is same as struct list_head cb_list
> >
> > Therefore, to hold the reference of finished fence at
> drm_sched_process_job
> > to prevent the null pointer during finished fence dma_fence_signal
> >
> > [ 732.912867] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> 0000000000000008
> > [ 732.914815] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> > [ 732.915731] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> > [ 732.916621] PGD 0 P4D 0
> > [ 732.917072] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI
> > [ 732.917682] CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Tainted: G
> OE 5.4.0-rc7 #1
> > [ 732.918980] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
> 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> > [ 732.920906] RIP: 0010:dma_fence_signal_locked+0x3e/0x100
> > [ 732.938569] Call Trace:
> > [ 732.939003] <IRQ>
> > [ 732.939364] dma_fence_signal+0x29/0x50
> > [ 732.940036] drm_sched_fence_finished+0x12/0x20 [gpu_sched]
> > [ 732.940996] drm_sched_process_job+0x34/0xa0 [gpu_sched]
> > [ 732.941910] dma_fence_signal_locked+0x85/0x100
> > [ 732.942692] dma_fence_signal+0x29/0x50
> > [ 732.943457] amdgpu_fence_process+0x99/0x120 [amdgpu]
> > [ 732.944393] sdma_v4_0_process_trap_irq+0x81/0xa0 [amdgpu]
> >
> > v2: hold the finished fence at drm_sched_process_job instead of
> > amdgpu_fence_process
> > v3: resume the blank line
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yintian Tao <yttao at amd.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index a18eabf692e4..8e731ed0d9d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -651,7 +651,9 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct
> dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
> >
> > trace_drm_sched_process_job(s_fence);
> >
> > + dma_fence_get(&s_fence->finished);
> > drm_sched_fence_finished(s_fence);
>
>
> If the fence was already released during call to
> drm_sched_fence_finished->dma_fence_signal->... why is it safe to
> reference the s_fence just before that call ? Can't it already be
> released by this time ?
>
> Andrey
>
>
>
> > + dma_fence_put(&s_fence->finished);
> > wake_up_interruptible(&sched->wake_up_worker);
> > }
> >
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cxinhui.pan%40amd.com%7C65933fca0b414d12aab408d7cfa51165%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637206180230440562&sdata=z6ec%2BcWkwjaDgZvkpL3jOMYkBtDjbNOxlXiAk4Ri5Ck%3D&reserved=0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20200324/fec36a07/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list