[PATCH v3 2/7] drm/ttm: Add ttm_kmap_obj_to_dma_buf_map() for type conversion
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Wed Oct 7 13:24:44 UTC 2020
Am 07.10.20 um 15:20 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
> Hi
>
> Am 07.10.20 um 15:10 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 2:57 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 02.10.20 um 11:58 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:51:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:34 PM Christian König
>>>>> <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Am 30.09.20 um 11:47 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:34:31AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>>>>>>> Am 30.09.20 um 10:19 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 30.09.20 um 10:05 schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.09.20 um 19:49 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Christian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.09.20 um 17:35 schrieb Christian König:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.09.20 um 17:14 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The new helper ttm_kmap_obj_to_dma_buf() extracts address and location
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from and instance of TTM's kmap_obj and initializes struct dma_buf_map
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with these values. Helpful for TTM-based drivers.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We could completely drop that if we use the same structure inside TTM as
>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Additional to that which driver is going to use this?
>>>>>>>>>>> As Daniel mentioned, it's in patch 3. The TTM-based drivers will
>>>>>>>>>>> retrieve the pointer via this function.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I do want to see all that being more tightly integrated into TTM, but
>>>>>>>>>>> not in this series. This one is about fixing the bochs-on-sparc64
>>>>>>>>>>> problem for good. Patch 7 adds an update to TTM to the DRM TODO list.
>>>>>>>>>> I should have asked which driver you try to fix here :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In this case just keep the function inside bochs and only fix it there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All other drivers can be fixed when we generally pump this through TTM.
>>>>>>>>> Did you take a look at patch 3? This function will be used by VRAM
>>>>>>>>> helpers, nouveau, radeon, amdgpu and qxl. If we don't put it here, we
>>>>>>>>> have to duplicate the functionality in each if these drivers. Bochs
>>>>>>>>> itself uses VRAM helpers and doesn't touch the function directly.
>>>>>>>> Ah, ok can we have that then only in the VRAM helpers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alternative you could go ahead and use dma_buf_map in ttm_bo_kmap_obj
>>>>>>>> directly and drop the hack with the TTM_BO_MAP_IOMEM_MASK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What I want to avoid is to have another conversion function in TTM because
>>>>>>>> what happens here is that we already convert from ttm_bus_placement to
>>>>>>>> ttm_bo_kmap_obj and then to dma_buf_map.
>>>>>>> Hm I'm not really seeing how that helps with a gradual conversion of
>>>>>>> everything over to dma_buf_map and assorted helpers for access? There's
>>>>>>> too many places in ttm drivers where is_iomem and related stuff is used to
>>>>>>> be able to convert it all in one go. An intermediate state with a bunch of
>>>>>>> conversions seems fairly unavoidable to me.
>>>>>> Fair enough. I would just have started bottom up and not top down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway feel free to go ahead with this approach as long as we can remove
>>>>>> the new function again when we clean that stuff up for good.
>>>>> Yeah I guess bottom up would make more sense as a refactoring. But the
>>>>> main motivation to land this here is to fix the __mmio vs normal
>>>>> memory confusion in the fbdev emulation helpers for sparc (and
>>>>> anything else that needs this). Hence the top down approach for
>>>>> rolling this out.
>>>> Ok I started reviewing this a bit more in-depth, and I think this is a bit
>>>> too much of a de-tour.
>>>>
>>>> Looking through all the callers of ttm_bo_kmap almost everyone maps the
>>>> entire object. Only vmwgfx uses to map less than that. Also, everyone just
>>>> immediately follows up with converting that full object map into a
>>>> pointer.
>>>>
>>>> So I think what we really want here is:
>>>> - new function
>>>>
>>>> int ttm_bo_vmap(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct dma_buf_map *map);
>>>>
>>>> _vmap name since that's consistent with both dma_buf functions and
>>>> what's usually used to implement this. Outside of the ttm world kmap
>>>> usually just means single-page mappings using kmap() or it's iomem
>>>> sibling io_mapping_map* so rather confusing name for a function which
>>>> usually is just used to set up a vmap of the entire buffer.
>>>>
>>>> - a helper which can be used for the drm_gem_object_funcs vmap/vunmap
>>>> functions for all ttm drivers. We should be able to make this fully
>>>> generic because a) we now have dma_buf_map and b) drm_gem_object is
>>>> embedded in the ttm_bo, so we can upcast for everyone who's both a ttm
>>>> and gem driver.
>>>>
>>>> This is maybe a good follow-up, since it should allow us to ditch quite
>>>> a bit of the vram helper code for this more generic stuff. I also might
>>>> have missed some special-cases here, but from a quick look everything
>>>> just pins the buffer to the current location and that's it.
>>>>
>>>> Also this obviously requires Christian's generic ttm_bo_pin rework
>>>> first.
>>>>
>>>> - roll the above out to drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Christian/Thomas, thoughts on this?
>>> I agree on the goals, but what is the immediate objective here?
>>>
>>> Adding ttm_bo_vmap() does not work out easily, as struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj
>>> is a central part of the internals of TTM. struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj has
>>> more internal state that struct dma_buf_map, so they are not easily
>>> convertible either. What you propose seems to require a reimplementation
>>> of the existing ttm_bo_kmap() code. That is it's own patch series.
>>>
>>> I'd rather go with some variant of the existing patch and add
>>> ttm_bo_vmap() in a follow-up.
>> ttm_bo_vmap would simply wrap what you currently open-code as
>> ttm_bo_kmap + ttm_kmap_obj_to_dma_buf_map. Removing ttm_kmap_obj would
>> be a much later step. Why do you think adding ttm_bo_vmap is not
>> possible?
> The calls to ttm_bo_kmap/_kunmap() require an instance of struct
> ttm_bo_kmap_obj that is stored in each driver's private bo structure
> (e.g., struct drm_gem_vram_object, struct radeon_bo, etc). When I made
> patch 3, I flirted with the idea of unifying the driver's _vmap code in
> a shared helper, but I couldn't find a simple way of doing it. That's
> why it's open-coded in the first place.
Well that makes kind of sense. Keep in mind that ttm_bo_kmap is
currently way to complicated.
Christian.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>> -Daniel
>>
>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>>> I think for the immediate need of rolling this out for vram helpers and
>>>> fbdev code we should be able to do this, but just postpone the driver wide
>>>> roll-out for now.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Daniel
>>>>
>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>> include/linux/dma-buf-map.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> index c96a25d571c8..62d89f05a801 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/drm_hashtab.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +#include <linux/dma-buf-map.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/kref.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/list.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> #include <linux/wait.h>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -486,6 +487,29 @@ static inline void *ttm_kmap_obj_virtual(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ttm_bo_kmap_obj *map,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return map->virtual;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * ttm_kmap_obj_to_dma_buf_map
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @kmap: A struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj returned from ttm_bo_kmap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @map: Returns the mapping as struct dma_buf_map
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * Converts struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj to struct dma_buf_map. If the memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * is not mapped, the returned mapping is initialized to NULL.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static inline void ttm_kmap_obj_to_dma_buf_map(struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *kmap,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct dma_buf_map *map)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + bool is_iomem;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + void *vaddr = ttm_kmap_obj_virtual(kmap, &is_iomem);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (!vaddr)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + dma_buf_map_clear(map);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + else if (is_iomem)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + dma_buf_map_set_vaddr_iomem(map, (void __force __iomem *)vaddr);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + dma_buf_map_set_vaddr(map, vaddr);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * ttm_bo_kmap
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> index fd1aba545fdf..2e8bbecb5091 100644
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf-map.h
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * dma_buf_map_set_vaddr(&map. 0xdeadbeaf);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * To set an address in I/O memory, use dma_buf_map_set_vaddr_iomem().
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * .. code-block:: c
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * dma_buf_map_set_vaddr_iomem(&map. 0xdeadbeaf);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Test if a mapping is valid with either dma_buf_map_is_set() or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * dma_buf_map_is_null().
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -118,6 +124,20 @@ static inline void dma_buf_map_set_vaddr(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma_buf_map *map, void *vaddr)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> map->is_iomem = false;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +/**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * dma_buf_map_set_vaddr_iomem - Sets a dma-buf mapping structure to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an address in I/O memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @map: The dma-buf mapping structure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * @vaddr_iomem: An I/O-memory address
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + *
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + * Sets the address and the I/O-memory flag.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +static inline void dma_buf_map_set_vaddr_iomem(struct dma_buf_map *map,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + void __iomem *vaddr_iomem)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + map->vaddr_iomem = vaddr_iomem;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> + map->is_iomem = true;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> /**
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * dma_buf_map_is_equal - Compares two dma-buf mapping structures
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for equality
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * @lhs: The dma-buf mapping structure
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C472c3d655a61411deb6708d86525d1b8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637370560438965013&sdata=HdHOA%2F1VcIX%2F7YtfYTiAqYEvw7Ag%2FS%2BxS5VwJKOv5y0%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C472c3d655a61411deb6708d86525d1b8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637370560438965013&sdata=H%2B5HKCsTrksRV2EyEiFGSTyS79jsWCmJimSMoJYusx8%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> dri-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C472c3d655a61411deb6708d86525d1b8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637370560438965013&sdata=HdHOA%2F1VcIX%2F7YtfYTiAqYEvw7Ag%2FS%2BxS5VwJKOv5y0%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>>>>>>>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>>>>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C472c3d655a61411deb6708d86525d1b8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637370560438965013&sdata=H%2B5HKCsTrksRV2EyEiFGSTyS79jsWCmJimSMoJYusx8%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Vetter
>>>>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>>>>> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>>> --
>>> Thomas Zimmermann
>>> Graphics Driver Developer
>>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>>> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>>> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>>> Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
>>>
>>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list