[PATCH 01/20] drm/amdgpu: Introduce GEM object functions
Thomas Zimmermann
tzimmermann at suse.de
Mon Sep 14 15:05:49 UTC 2020
Hi
Am 13.08.20 um 12:22 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 13.08.20 um 10:36 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
>> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in
>> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with
>> per-instance callbacks in amdgpu. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap,
>> which is non-trivial to convert.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 6 ------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> index 81a79760ca61..51525b8774c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> @@ -1468,19 +1468,13 @@ static struct drm_driver kms_driver = {
>> .lastclose = amdgpu_driver_lastclose_kms,
>> .irq_handler = amdgpu_irq_handler,
>> .ioctls = amdgpu_ioctls_kms,
>> - .gem_free_object_unlocked = amdgpu_gem_object_free,
>> - .gem_open_object = amdgpu_gem_object_open,
>> - .gem_close_object = amdgpu_gem_object_close,
>> .dumb_create = amdgpu_mode_dumb_create,
>> .dumb_map_offset = amdgpu_mode_dumb_mmap,
>> .fops = &amdgpu_driver_kms_fops,
>> .prime_handle_to_fd = drm_gem_prime_handle_to_fd,
>> .prime_fd_to_handle = drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle,
>> - .gem_prime_export = amdgpu_gem_prime_export,
>> .gem_prime_import = amdgpu_gem_prime_import,
>> - .gem_prime_vmap = amdgpu_gem_prime_vmap,
>> - .gem_prime_vunmap = amdgpu_gem_prime_vunmap,
>> .gem_prime_mmap = amdgpu_gem_prime_mmap,
>> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> index 43f4966331dd..ca2b79f94e99 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>> #include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_cache.h>
>> #include "amdgpu.h"
>> +#include "amdgpu_dma_buf.h"
>> #include "amdgpu_trace.h"
>> #include "amdgpu_amdkfd.h"
>> @@ -510,6 +511,15 @@ bool amdgpu_bo_support_uswc(u64 bo_flags)
>> #endif
>> }
>> +static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs amdgpu_gem_object_funcs = {
>> + .free = amdgpu_gem_object_free,
>> + .open = amdgpu_gem_object_open,
>> + .close = amdgpu_gem_object_close,
>> + .export = amdgpu_gem_prime_export,
>> + .vmap = amdgpu_gem_prime_vmap,
>> + .vunmap = amdgpu_gem_prime_vunmap,
>> +};
>> +
>
> Wrong file, this belongs into amdgpu_gem.c
>
>> static int amdgpu_bo_do_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_bo_param *bp,
>> struct amdgpu_bo **bo_ptr)
>> @@ -552,6 +562,8 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_do_create(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> bo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo), GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (bo == NULL)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + bo->tbo.base.funcs = &amdgpu_gem_object_funcs;
>
> And this should probably go into amdgpu_gem_object_create().
I'm trying to understand what amdgpu does. What about all the places
where amdgpu calls amdgpu_bo_create() internally? Wouldn't these miss
the free callback for the GEM object?
Best regards
Thomas
>
> Apart from that looks like a good idea to me.
>
> Christian.
>
>> drm_gem_private_object_init(adev->ddev, &bo->tbo.base, size);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bo->shadow_list);
>> bo->vm_bo = NULL;
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 516 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20200914/2cc15a54/attachment.sig>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list