[PATCH -next 0/8] drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Sep 16 15:31:38 UTC 2020
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:02:18PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 16.09.20 um 15:36 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:51 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > > > Am 15.09.20 um 21:35 schrieb Ville Syrjälä:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:16:32PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > > > I question the value of these warnings. Why even have a boolean type
> > > > > > if you are going to get warnings when you use them...
> > > > > > That said, applied to avoid getting these patches again and again
> > > > > > every time someone sees this.
> > > > > if (this_is_sparta)
> > > > > if (this_is_sparta == true)
> > > > > if (this_is_sparta != false)
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the first one reads the best, and avoids having to
> > > > > decide between truth and falsehood :)
> > > > +1
> > > +1, especially because we also have the inversion when using negative
> > > errno codes for failures and 0 as success, which results in
> > >
> > > if (errno == 0) /* success case */
> > >
> > > but
> > > if (bool == 0) /* failure case */
> > >
> > > now creative people do sometimes
> > >
> > > if (!errno) /* success case */
> > >
> > > which I think is horribly confusing. So imo for more easier telling apart
> > > of these too I think consistently using the short form for booleans, and
> > > consistently using the more explicit long form for errno checks is a Very
> > > Good Pattern :-)
> > I don't disagree with your logic, but we regularly get patches to
> > convert errno checks to drop the direct comparison because that is the
> > "preferred kernel style". Arguably, we should be explicit in all
> > cases as that avoids all confusion. With that in mind, my original
> > point stands. Why have a type when comparisons against valid settings
> > for that type produce errors?
Oh, I didn't know that this happens for errno too.
I withdraw my +1 and concur this is a bikeshed. I guess still applying to
shut up the patch stream is the most reasonable thing :-/
-Daniel
> Well it isn't an error, but raising a nice warning is most likely a good
> idea.
>
> Christian.
>
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > > Cheers, Daniel
> > >
> > > > Christian.
> > > >
> > > > > > Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:21 AM Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> for the series.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am 09.09.20 um 15:07 schrieb Zheng Bin:
> > > > > > > > Zheng Bin (8):
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in gfx_v9_0.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in gfx_v10_0.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in sdma_v5_0.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in sdma_v5_2.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in si.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in uvd_v6_0.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in
> > > > > > > > amdgpu_atpx_handler.c
> > > > > > > > drm/amd/amdgpu: fix comparison pointer to bool warning in sdma_v4_0.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_atpx_handler.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_0.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_0.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v5_2.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/si.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/uvd_v6_0.c | 4 ++--
> > > > > > > > 8 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > amd-gfx mailing list
> > > > > > > amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cdc7a8d7517d341e3a80c08d85a458ba8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637358602051676053&sdata=MS0vcBcU7unXjEFlbd8kLbJkJ4sKcvIdLjc8yhX4UUI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > > > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cdc7a8d7517d341e3a80c08d85a458ba8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637358602051686051&sdata=MgfR%2BwCVY9gWfhQ9i5kWcKiiYkV1C8O2dEKlZYSqscE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cdc7a8d7517d341e3a80c08d85a458ba8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637358602051686051&sdata=MgfR%2BwCVY9gWfhQ9i5kWcKiiYkV1C8O2dEKlZYSqscE%3D&reserved=0
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.ffwll.ch%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cdc7a8d7517d341e3a80c08d85a458ba8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637358602051686051&sdata=GvLs5OXw2Ny%2BieJxm8hjawNb0rGA966539iAwlWwPMY%3D&reserved=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list