[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2)

Chen, Guchun Guchun.Chen at amd.com
Tue Aug 3 01:56:32 UTC 2021


[Public]

Hi Alex,

I submitted the patch before your message, I will take care of this next time.

Regards,
Guchun

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 9:35 PM
To: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen at amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Gao, Likun <Likun.Gao at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2)

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 4:23 AM Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen at amd.com> wrote:
>
> [Public]
>
> Thank you, Christian.
>
> Regarding fence_drv.initialized, it looks to a bit redundant, anyway let me look into this more.

Does this patch fix this bug?
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F-%2Fissues%2F1668&data=04%7C01%7CGuchun.Chen%40amd.com%7C2bf8bebf5b424751572408d955ba66e8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637635081353279181%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=FuAo44Ws5SnuCxt45A%2Fqmu%2B3OfEkat1G%2BixO8G9uDVc%3D&reserved=0

If so, please add:
Bug: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F-%2Fissues%2F1668&data=04%7C01%7CGuchun.Chen%40amd.com%7C2bf8bebf5b424751572408d955ba66e8%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637635081353279181%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=FuAo44Ws5SnuCxt45A%2Fqmu%2B3OfEkat1G%2BixO8G9uDVc%3D&reserved=0
to the commit message.

Alex

>
> Regards,
> Guchun
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 2:56 PM
> To: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; 
> Gao, Likun <Likun.Gao at amd.com>; Koenig, Christian 
> <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>; 
> Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver 
> fini in s3 test (v2)
>
> Am 02.08.21 um 07:16 schrieb Guchun Chen:
> > In amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini, no need to call drm_sched_fini to 
> > stop scheduler in s3 test, otherwise, fence related failure will 
> > arrive after resume. To fix this and for a better clean up, move 
> > drm_sched_fini from fence_hw_fini to fence_sw_fini, as it's part of 
> > driver shutdown, and should never be called in hw_fini.
> >
> > v2: rename amdgpu_fence_driver_init to amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init, 
> > to keep sw_init and sw_fini paired.
> >
> > Fixes: cd87a6dcf6af drm/amdgpu: adjust fence driver enable sequence
> > Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen at amd.com>
>
> It's a bit ambiguous now what fence_drv.initialized means, but I think we can live with that for now.
>
> Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c |  5 ++---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c  | 12 +++++++-----
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h   |  4 ++--
> >   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > index b1d2dc39e8be..9e53ff851496 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> > @@ -3646,9 +3646,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device 
> > *adev,
> >
> >   fence_driver_init:
> >       /* Fence driver */
> > -     r = amdgpu_fence_driver_init(adev);
> > +     r = amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(adev);
> >       if (r) {
> > -             dev_err(adev->dev, "amdgpu_fence_driver_init failed\n");
> > +             dev_err(adev->dev, "amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init 
> > + failed\n");
> >               amdgpu_vf_error_put(adev, AMDGIM_ERROR_VF_FENCE_INIT_FAIL, 0, 0);
> >               goto failed;
> >       }
> > @@ -3988,7 +3988,6 @@ int amdgpu_device_resume(struct drm_device *dev, bool fbcon)
> >       }
> >       amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(adev);
> >
> > -
> >       r = amdgpu_device_ip_late_init(adev);
> >       if (r)
> >               return r;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > index 49c5c7331c53..7495911516c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> > @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> >   }
> >
> >   /**
> > - * amdgpu_fence_driver_init - init the fence driver
> > + * amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init - init the fence driver
> >    * for all possible rings.
> >    *
> >    * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
> > @@ -509,13 +509,13 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> >    * amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring().
> >    * Returns 0 for success.
> >    */
> > -int amdgpu_fence_driver_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> > +int amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >   {
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >
> >   /**
> > - * amdgpu_fence_driver_fini - tear down the fence driver
> > + * amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini - tear down the fence driver
> >    * for all possible rings.
> >    *
> >    * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
> > @@ -531,8 +531,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini(struct
> > amdgpu_device *adev)
> >
> >               if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
> >                       continue;
> > -             if (!ring->no_scheduler)
> > -                     drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched);
> > +
> >               /* You can't wait for HW to signal if it's gone */
> >               if (!drm_dev_is_unplugged(&adev->ddev))
> >                       r = amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring); @@ -560,6 
> > +559,9 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> >               if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
> >                       continue;
> >
> > +             if (!ring->no_scheduler)
> > +                     drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched);
> > +
> >               for (j = 0; j <= ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask; ++j)
> >                       dma_fence_put(ring->fence_drv.fences[j]);
> >               kfree(ring->fence_drv.fences); diff --git 
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> > index 27adffa7658d..9c11ced4312c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> > @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ struct amdgpu_fence_driver {
> >       struct dma_fence                **fences;
> >   };
> >
> > -int amdgpu_fence_driver_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   void amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(struct amdgpu_ring 
> > *ring);
> >
> >   int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, @@
> > -115,9 +114,10 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> >   int amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> >                                  struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq_src,
> >                                  unsigned irq_type);
> > +void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> > +int amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev); 
> > -void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> >   int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct dma_fence **fence,
> >                     unsigned flags);
> >   int amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t *s,


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list