[PATCH v5] drm/radeon/radeon_kms: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in radeon_driver_open_kms()

[Christian König]

Am 01.12.21 um 16:13 schrieb Zhou Qingyang:
> In radeon_driver_open_kms(), radeon_vm_bo_add() is assigned to
> vm->ib_bo_va and passes and used in radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(). In
> radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(), there is a dereference of vm->ib_bo_va,
> which could lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of
> radeon_vm_bo_add().
>
> Fix this bug by adding a check of vm->ib_bo_va.
>
> This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs
> differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations
> (e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the
> inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or
> the callers, so they constitute bugs.
>
> Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false
> positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed
> the bug.
>
> Builds with CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m show no new warnings,
> and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.
>
> Fixes: cc9e67e3d700 ("drm/radeon: fix VM IB handling")
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Qingyang <zhou1615 at umn.edu>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
>    -  Use conditions to avoid unnecessary initialization
>
> Changes in v4:
>    -  Initialize the variables to silence warning
>
> Changes in v3:
>    -  Fix the bug that good case will also be freed
>    -  Improve code style
>
> Changes in v2:
>    -  Improve the error handling into goto style
>
>   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> index 482fb0ae6cb5..66aee48fd09d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> @@ -648,6 +648,8 @@ void radeon_driver_lastclose_kms(struct drm_device *dev)
>   int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>   {
>   	struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
> +	struct radeon_fpriv *fpriv;
> +	struct radeon_vm *vm;
>   	int r;
>   
>   	file_priv->driver_priv = NULL;
> @@ -660,8 +662,6 @@ int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>   
>   	/* new gpu have virtual address space support */
>   	if (rdev->family >= CHIP_CAYMAN) {
> -		struct radeon_fpriv *fpriv;
> -		struct radeon_vm *vm;
>   
>   		fpriv = kzalloc(sizeof(*fpriv), GFP_KERNEL);
>   		if (unlikely(!fpriv)) {
> @@ -672,35 +672,39 @@ int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>   		if (rdev->accel_working) {
>   			vm = &fpriv->vm;
>   			r = radeon_vm_init(rdev, vm);
> -			if (r) {
> -				kfree(fpriv);
> -				goto out_suspend;
> -			}
> +			if (r)
> +				goto out_fpriv;
>   
>   			r = radeon_bo_reserve(rdev->ring_tmp_bo.bo, false);
> -			if (r) {
> -				radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> -				kfree(fpriv);
> -				goto out_suspend;
> -			}
> +			if (r)
> +				goto out_vm_fini;
>   
>   			/* map the ib pool buffer read only into
>   			 * virtual address space */
>   			vm->ib_bo_va = radeon_vm_bo_add(rdev, vm,
>   							rdev->ring_tmp_bo.bo);
> +			if (!vm->ib_bo_va) {
> +				r = -ENOMEM;
> +				goto out_vm_fini;
> +			}
> +
>   			r = radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(rdev, vm->ib_bo_va,
>   						  RADEON_VA_IB_OFFSET,
>   						  RADEON_VM_PAGE_READABLE |
>   						  RADEON_VM_PAGE_SNOOPED);
> -			if (r) {
> -				radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> -				kfree(fpriv);
> -				goto out_suspend;
> -			}
> +			if (r)
> +				goto out_vm_fini;
>   		}
>   		file_priv->driver_priv = fpriv;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!r)

I think that test is unecessary now, maybe double check.

Either way patch Reviewed-by: Christian König 
<christian.koenig at amd.com>. Alex will probably pick it up now.

Thanks for the help,
Christian.

> +		goto out_suspend;
> +
> +out_vm_fini:
> +	radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> +out_fpriv:
> +	kfree(fpriv);
>   out_suspend:
>   	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
>   	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);