[PATCH 3/3] drm: fix the warnning of string style for scheduler trace.
Huang Rui
ray.huang at amd.com
Mon Dec 20 05:30:54 UTC 2021
A soft reminder. May I know any comments of this patch, just a minor
warning fix?
Thanks,
Ray
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:34:22PM +0800, Huang, Ray wrote:
> Use __string(), __assign_str() and __get_str() helpers in the TRACE_EVENT()
> instead of string definitions in gpu scheduler trace.
>
> [ 158.890890] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 158.890899] fmt: 'entity=%p, id=%llu, fence=%p, ring=%s, job count:%u, hw job count:%d
> ' current_buffer: ' Xorg-1588 [001] ..... 149.391136: drm_sched_job: entity=0000000076f0d517, id=1, fence=000000008dd56028, ring='
> [ 158.890910] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 1617 at kernel/trace/trace.c:3830 trace_check_vprintf+0x481/0x4a0
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
> index 877ce9b127f1..4e397790c195 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler_trace.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_job,
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(struct drm_sched_entity *, entity)
> __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
> + __string(name, sched_job->sched->name)
> __field(const char *, name)
> __field(uint64_t, id)
> __field(u32, job_count)
> @@ -48,14 +49,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_job,
> __entry->entity = entity;
> __entry->id = sched_job->id;
> __entry->fence = &sched_job->s_fence->finished;
> - __entry->name = sched_job->sched->name;
> + __assign_str(name, sched_job->sched->name);
> __entry->job_count = spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue);
> __entry->hw_job_count = atomic_read(
> &sched_job->sched->hw_rq_count);
> ),
> TP_printk("entity=%p, id=%llu, fence=%p, ring=%s, job count:%u, hw job count:%d",
> __entry->entity, __entry->id,
> - __entry->fence, __entry->name,
> + __entry->fence, __get_str(name),
> __entry->job_count, __entry->hw_job_count)
> );
>
> @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_run_job,
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(struct drm_sched_entity *, entity)
> __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
> - __field(const char *, name)
> + __string(name, sched_job->sched->name)
> __field(uint64_t, id)
> __field(u32, job_count)
> __field(int, hw_job_count)
> @@ -75,14 +76,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_run_job,
> __entry->entity = entity;
> __entry->id = sched_job->id;
> __entry->fence = &sched_job->s_fence->finished;
> - __entry->name = sched_job->sched->name;
> + __assign_str(name, sched_job->sched->name);
> __entry->job_count = spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue);
> __entry->hw_job_count = atomic_read(
> &sched_job->sched->hw_rq_count);
> ),
> TP_printk("entity=%p, id=%llu, fence=%p, ring=%s, job count:%u, hw job count:%d",
> __entry->entity, __entry->id,
> - __entry->fence, __entry->name,
> + __entry->fence, __get_str(name),
> __entry->job_count, __entry->hw_job_count)
> );
>
> @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_job_wait_dep,
> TP_PROTO(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job, struct dma_fence *fence),
> TP_ARGS(sched_job, fence),
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> - __field(const char *,name)
> + __string(name, sched_job->sched->name)
> __field(uint64_t, id)
> __field(struct dma_fence *, fence)
> __field(uint64_t, ctx)
> @@ -111,14 +112,14 @@ TRACE_EVENT(drm_sched_job_wait_dep,
> ),
>
> TP_fast_assign(
> - __entry->name = sched_job->sched->name;
> + __assign_str(name, sched_job->sched->name);
> __entry->id = sched_job->id;
> __entry->fence = fence;
> __entry->ctx = fence->context;
> __entry->seqno = fence->seqno;
> ),
> TP_printk("job ring=%s, id=%llu, depends fence=%p, context=%llu, seq=%u",
> - __entry->name, __entry->id,
> + __get_str(name), __entry->id,
> __entry->fence, __entry->ctx,
> __entry->seqno)
> );
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list