[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu/display: buffer INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT interrupt work
Andrey Grodzovsky
Andrey.Grodzovsky at amd.com
Tue Jan 19 22:29:22 UTC 2021
On 1/15/21 2:21 AM, Chen, Xiaogang wrote:
> On 1/14/2021 1:24 AM, Grodzovsky, Andrey wrote:
>>
>> On 1/14/21 12:11 AM, Chen, Xiaogang wrote:
>>> On 1/12/2021 10:54 PM, Grodzovsky, Andrey wrote:
>>>> On 1/4/21 1:01 AM, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
>>>>> From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen at amd.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> amdgpu DM handles INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT interrupt(hpd, hpd_rx) by
>>>>> using work queue and uses single work_struct. If previous interrupt
>>>>> has not been handled new interrupts(same type) will be discarded and
>>>>> driver just sends "amdgpu_dm_irq_schedule_work FAILED" message out.
>>>>> If some important hpd, hpd_rx related interrupts are missed by driver
>>>>> the hot (un)plug devices may cause system hang or unstable, such as
>>>>> system resumes from S3 sleep with mst device connected.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch dynamically allocates new amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data for
>>>>> new interrupts if previous INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT interrupt work
>>>>> has not been handled. So the new interrupt works can be queued to the
>>>>> same workqueue_struct, instead discard the new interrupts.
>>>>> All allocated amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data are put into a single linked
>>>>> list and will be reused after.
>>>>
>>>> I believe this creates a possible concurrency between already
>>>> executing work item
>>>> and the new incoming one for which you allocate a new work item on
>>>> the fly. While
>>>> handle_hpd_irq is serialized with aconnector->hpd_lock I am seeing
>>>> that for handle_hpd_rx_irq
>>>> it's not locked for MST use case (which is the most frequently used
>>>> with this interrupt). Did you
>>>> verified that handle_hpd_rx_irq is reentrant ?
>>>>
>>> handle_hpd_rx_irq is put at a work queue. Its execution is serialized
>>> by the work queue. So there is no reentrant.
>>>
>> You are using system_highpri_wq which has the property that it has
>> multiple workers thread pool spread across all the
>> active CPUs, see all work queue definitions here
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/include/linux/workqueue.h#L358
>> I beleieve that what you saying about no chance of reentrnacy would be
>> correct if it would be same work item dequeued for execution
>> while previous instance is still running, see the explanation here -
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/kernel/workqueue.c#L1435.
>> Non reentrancy is guaranteed only for the same work item. If you want
>> non reentrancy (full serializtion) for different work items you should
>> create
>> you own single threaded work-queue using create_singlethread_workqueue
>>
>>
> Thank you. I think the easiest way is using aconnector->hpd_lock at
> handle_hpd_rx_irq to lock for dc_link->type == dc_connection_mst_branch
> case, right? I will do that at next version if you think it is ok.
I am not sure what are the consequences of of using hpd lock there with
regard to other locks acquired in DRM MST code during MST related HPD
transactions since
i haven't dealt with this for a very long time. Maybe Harry or Nick can advise
on this ?
Andrey
>
>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_schedule_work does queuing of work(put
>>> handle_hpd_rx_irq into work queue). The first call is
>>> dm_irq_work_func, then call handle_hpd_rx_irq.
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h | 14 +--
>>>>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c | 114
>>>>> ++++++++++++++-------
>>>>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h
>>>>> index c9d82b9..730e540 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h
>>>>> @@ -69,18 +69,6 @@ struct common_irq_params {
>>>>> };
>>>>> /**
>>>>> - * struct irq_list_head - Linked-list for low context IRQ handlers.
>>>>> - *
>>>>> - * @head: The list_head within &struct handler_data
>>>>> - * @work: A work_struct containing the deferred handler work
>>>>> - */
>>>>> -struct irq_list_head {
>>>>> - struct list_head head;
>>>>> - /* In case this interrupt needs post-processing, 'work' will
>>>>> be queued*/
>>>>> - struct work_struct work;
>>>>> -};
>>>>> -
>>>>> -/**
>>>>> * struct dm_compressor_info - Buffer info used by frame buffer
>>>>> compression
>>>>> * @cpu_addr: MMIO cpu addr
>>>>> * @bo_ptr: Pointer to the buffer object
>>>>> @@ -270,7 +258,7 @@ struct amdgpu_display_manager {
>>>>> * Note that handlers are called in the same order as they were
>>>>> * registered (FIFO).
>>>>> */
>>>>> - struct irq_list_head
>>>>> irq_handler_list_low_tab[DAL_IRQ_SOURCES_NUMBER];
>>>>> + struct list_head
>>>>> irq_handler_list_low_tab[DAL_IRQ_SOURCES_NUMBER];
>>>>> /**
>>>>> * @irq_handler_list_high_tab:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
>>>>> index 3577785..ada344a 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c
>>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data {
>>>>> struct amdgpu_display_manager *dm;
>>>>> /* DAL irq source which registered for this interrupt. */
>>>>> enum dc_irq_source irq_source;
>>>>> + struct work_struct work;
>>>>> };
>>>>> #define DM_IRQ_TABLE_LOCK(adev, flags) \
>>>>> @@ -111,20 +112,10 @@ static void init_handler_common_data(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *hcd,
>>>>> */
>>>>> static void dm_irq_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - struct irq_list_head *irq_list_head =
>>>>> - container_of(work, struct irq_list_head, work);
>>>>> - struct list_head *handler_list = &irq_list_head->head;
>>>>> - struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler_data;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - list_for_each_entry(handler_data, handler_list, list) {
>>>>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DM_IRQ: work_func: for dal_src=%d\n",
>>>>> - handler_data->irq_source);
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler_data =
>>>>> + container_of(work, struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data, work);
>>>>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DM_IRQ: schedule_work: for dal_src=%d\n",
>>>>> - handler_data->irq_source);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - handler_data->handler(handler_data->handler_arg);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + handler_data->handler(handler_data->handler_arg);
>>>>> /* Call a DAL subcomponent which registered for interrupt
>>>>> notification
>>>>> * at INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT.
>>>>> @@ -156,7 +147,7 @@ static struct list_head
>>>>> *remove_irq_handler(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT:
>>>>> default:
>>>>> - hnd_list =
>>>>> &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source].head;
>>>>> + hnd_list = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source];
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -287,7 +278,8 @@ void *amdgpu_dm_irq_register_interrupt(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> break;
>>>>> case INTERRUPT_LOW_IRQ_CONTEXT:
>>>>> default:
>>>>> - hnd_list =
>>>>> &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source].head;
>>>>> + hnd_list = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source];
>>>>> + INIT_WORK(&handler_data->work, dm_irq_work_func);
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -369,7 +361,7 @@ void
>>>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_unregister_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> int amdgpu_dm_irq_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int src;
>>>>> - struct irq_list_head *lh;
>>>>> + struct list_head *lh;
>>>>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DM_IRQ\n");
>>>>> @@ -378,9 +370,7 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_init(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev)
>>>>> for (src = 0; src < DAL_IRQ_SOURCES_NUMBER; src++) {
>>>>> /* low context handler list init */
>>>>> lh = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src];
>>>>> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lh->head);
>>>>> - INIT_WORK(&lh->work, dm_irq_work_func);
>>>>> -
>>>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(lh);
>>>>> /* high context handler init */
>>>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adev->dm.irq_handler_list_high_tab[src]);
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -397,8 +387,11 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_init(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev)
>>>>> void amdgpu_dm_irq_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int src;
>>>>> - struct irq_list_head *lh;
>>>>> + struct list_head *lh;
>>>>> + struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler;
>>>>> unsigned long irq_table_flags;
>>>>> +
>>>>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DM_IRQ: releasing resources.\n");
>>>>> for (src = 0; src < DAL_IRQ_SOURCES_NUMBER; src++) {
>>>>> DM_IRQ_TABLE_LOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> @@ -407,7 +400,15 @@ void amdgpu_dm_irq_fini(struct amdgpu_device
>>>>> *adev)
>>>>> * (because no code can schedule a new one). */
>>>>> lh = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src];
>>>>> DM_IRQ_TABLE_UNLOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> - flush_work(&lh->work);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!list_empty(lh)) {
>>>>> + list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, lh) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + handler = list_entry(entry, struct
>>>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data,
>>>>> + list);
>>>>> + flush_work(&handler->work);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -417,6 +418,8 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_suspend(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> struct list_head *hnd_list_h;
>>>>> struct list_head *hnd_list_l;
>>>>> unsigned long irq_table_flags;
>>>>> + struct list_head *entry, *tmp;
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler;
>>>>> DM_IRQ_TABLE_LOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> @@ -427,14 +430,22 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_suspend(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> * will be disabled from manage_dm_interrupts on disable CRTC.
>>>>> */
>>>>> for (src = DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD1; src <= DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD6RX;
>>>>> src++) {
>>>>> - hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src].head;
>>>>> + hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src];
>>>>> hnd_list_h = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_high_tab[src];
>>>>> if (!list_empty(hnd_list_l) || !list_empty(hnd_list_h))
>>>>> dc_interrupt_set(adev->dm.dc, src, false);
>>>>> DM_IRQ_TABLE_UNLOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> - flush_work(&adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src].work);
>>>>> + if (!list_empty(hnd_list_l)) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + list_for_each_safe(entry, tmp, hnd_list_l) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + handler = list_entry(entry, struct
>>>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data,
>>>>> + list);
>>>>> + flush_work(&handler->work);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> DM_IRQ_TABLE_LOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> }
>>>>> @@ -454,7 +465,7 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_resume_early(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> /* re-enable short pulse interrupts HW interrupt */
>>>>> for (src = DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD1RX; src <= DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD6RX;
>>>>> src++) {
>>>>> - hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src].head;
>>>>> + hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src];
>>>>> hnd_list_h = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_high_tab[src];
>>>>> if (!list_empty(hnd_list_l) || !list_empty(hnd_list_h))
>>>>> dc_interrupt_set(adev->dm.dc, src, true);
>>>>> @@ -480,7 +491,7 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_resume_late(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> * will be enabled from manage_dm_interrupts on enable CRTC.
>>>>> */
>>>>> for (src = DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD1; src <= DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD6;
>>>>> src++) {
>>>>> - hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src].head;
>>>>> + hnd_list_l = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[src];
>>>>> hnd_list_h = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_high_tab[src];
>>>>> if (!list_empty(hnd_list_l) || !list_empty(hnd_list_h))
>>>>> dc_interrupt_set(adev->dm.dc, src, true);
>>>>> @@ -497,20 +508,53 @@ int amdgpu_dm_irq_resume_late(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>>> static void amdgpu_dm_irq_schedule_work(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>> enum dc_irq_source irq_source)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - unsigned long irq_table_flags;
>>>>> - struct work_struct *work = NULL;
>>>>> - DM_IRQ_TABLE_LOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> + struct list_head *handler_list =
>>>>> &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source];
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler_data;
>>>>> + bool work_queued = false;
>>>>> - if
>>>>> (!list_empty(&adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source].head))
>>>>> - work = &adev->dm.irq_handler_list_low_tab[irq_source].work;
>>>>> + if (list_empty(handler_list))
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> - DM_IRQ_TABLE_UNLOCK(adev, irq_table_flags);
>>>>> + list_for_each_entry(handler_data, handler_list, list) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &handler_data->work)) {
>>>>> + continue;
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + work_queued = true;
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!work_queued) {
>>>>> +
>>>>> + struct amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data *handler_data_add;
>>>>> + /*get the amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data of first item pointed
>>>>> by handler_list*/
>>>>> + handler_data = container_of(handler_list->next, struct
>>>>> amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data, list);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*allocate a new amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data*/
>>>>> + handler_data_add = kzalloc(sizeof(*handler_data),
>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + if (!handler_data_add) {
>>>>> + DRM_ERROR("DM_IRQ: failed to allocate irq handler!\n");
>>>>> + return;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*copy new amdgpu_dm_irq_handler_data members from
>>>>> handler_data*/
>>>>> + handler_data_add->handler = handler_data->handler;
>>>>> + handler_data_add->handler_arg = handler_data->handler_arg;
>>>>> + handler_data_add->dm = handler_data->dm;
>>>>> + handler_data_add->irq_source = irq_source;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + list_add_tail(&handler_data_add->list, handler_list);
>>>>
>>>> At what place are you deleting completed work items from the
>>>> handler_list ?
>>>>
>>>> Andrey
>>>>
>>> The new allocated work item handler_data_add is put at end of single
>>> list handler_list. It is not deleted, but put into this list. In the
>>> future for same interrupt source handling the previous allocated work
>>> items can be reused. So we do not have to reallocate new work items
>>> if previous interrupts have not been handled by cpu. On other side
>>> system will keep all the allocated work items at run time. Note, the
>>> new work item allocation only happens when cpu has not handled
>>> previous interrupts yet, and new same type interrupts have came.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Xiaogang
>>>
>> I am still confused, how you avoid executing a second time a handler
>> you previously allocated because first queue_work failed,
>> you always start iteration from beginning of the list and you never
>> remove already successfully executed handlers.
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>
> Not sure if understand your question. If the first time queuing work
> item success there is no second time queuing the same work item. The
> second work item is a different one although they use same
> handle_hpd_rx_irq. The queued work items are managed by work
> queue(queue_work). Work queue knows each queued work item status: still
> on queue, running, or exist. I look from already allocated work items to
> see if work queue allows me to queue, until find one. If all allocated
> work items cannot be queued, allocate a new work item and put it at the
> list of allocated work items.
>
> Thanks
>
> Xiaogang
>
>
>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + INIT_WORK(&handler_data_add->work, dm_irq_work_func);
>>>>> - if (work) {
>>>>> - if (!schedule_work(work))
>>>>> - DRM_INFO("amdgpu_dm_irq_schedule_work FAILED src %d\n",
>>>>> - irq_source);
>>>>> + if (queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &handler_data_add->work))
>>>>> + DRM_DEBUG("__func__: a work_struct is allocated and
>>>>> queued, "
>>>>> + "src %d\n", irq_source);
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + DRM_ERROR("__func__: a new work_struct cannot be
>>>>> queued, "
>>>>> + "something is wrong, src %d\n", irq_source);
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list