[PATCH 03/14] drm/atmel-hlcdc: Convert to Linux IRQ interfaces
tzimmermann at suse.de
Wed Jul 28 18:17:41 UTC 2021
Am 28.07.21 um 20:11 schrieb Sam Ravnborg:
> Hi Dan,
> thanks for the quick feedback!
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 05:50:34PM +0000, Dan.Sneddon at microchip.com wrote:
>> On 7/28/21 8:44 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>> Hi Dan,
>>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 03:11:08PM +0000, Dan.Sneddon at microchip.com wrote:
>>>> On 7/28/21 7:00 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>> [You don't often get email from sam at ravnborg.org. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]
>>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>> I hope you can fine to test this patch from Thomas.
>>>>> If this works then we can forget about my attempt to do the same.
>>>> I'll test this as soon as I can and let you know.
>>> Thanks, crossing my fingers... (which explains the funny spelling from
>>> time to time)
>>> So I ran the test on an A5D27 XULT board with a PDA5 display. Our
>> graphics demos that come with our linux4sam releases seem to run just
>> fine. modetest -v seems to run just fine. However, vbltest returns
>> "drmWaitVBlank (relative) failed ret: -1". I don't understand why
>> modetest -v is working and vbltest isn't, but that's what I'm seeing.
Thanks for testing.
> Strange indeed.
> Just to be sure...
> Can you confirm that vbltest is working OK *before* this patch?
Yes, can you please verify that it regressed. If so, this would mean
that the driver misses vblank interrupts with the patch applied.
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the amd-gfx