[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: take back kvmalloc_array for entries alloc because of kzalloc memory limit
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Wed Jun 2 08:33:46 UTC 2021
Am 02.06.21 um 10:30 schrieb Changfeng:
> From: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>
>
> From: Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>
>
> It will cause error when alloc memory larger than 128KB in
> amdgpu_bo_create->kzalloc.
Well NAK, in that case we should just switch to kvmalloc here.
Christian.
>
> Call Trace:
> alloc_pages_current+0x6a/0xe0
> kmalloc_order+0x32/0xb0
> kmalloc_order_trace+0x1e/0x80
> __kmalloc+0x249/0x2d0
> amdgpu_bo_create+0x102/0x500 [amdgpu]
> ? xas_create+0x264/0x3e0
> amdgpu_bo_create_vm+0x32/0x60 [amdgpu]
> amdgpu_vm_pt_create+0xf5/0x260 [amdgpu]
> amdgpu_vm_init+0x1fd/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
>
> Change-Id: I29e479db45ead37c39449e856599fd4f6a0e34ce
> Signed-off-by: Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index 1923f035713a..714d613d020b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -894,6 +894,10 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_pt_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> num_entries = 0;
>
> bp.bo_ptr_size = struct_size((*vmbo), entries, num_entries);
> + if (bp.bo_ptr_size > 32*AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + DRM_INFO("Can't alloc memory larger than 128KB by using kzalloc in amdgpu_bo_create\n");
> + bp.bo_ptr_size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_vm);
> + }
>
> if (vm->use_cpu_for_update)
> bp.flags |= AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_CPU_ACCESS_REQUIRED;
> @@ -965,15 +969,19 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_alloc_pts(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_bo_vm *pt;
> int r;
>
> - if (entry->base.bo) {
> - if (cursor->level < AMDGPU_VM_PTB)
> - entry->entries =
> - to_amdgpu_bo_vm(entry->base.bo)->entries;
> - else
> - entry->entries = NULL;
> - return 0;
> + if (cursor->level < AMDGPU_VM_PTB && !entry->entries) {
> + unsigned num_entries;
> + num_entries = amdgpu_vm_num_entries(adev, cursor->level);
> + entry->entries = kvmalloc_array(num_entries,
> + sizeof(*entry->entries),
> + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> + if (!entry->entries)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> + if (entry->base.bo)
> + return 0;
> +
> r = amdgpu_vm_pt_create(adev, vm, cursor->level, immediate, &pt);
> if (r)
> return r;
> @@ -984,10 +992,6 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_alloc_pts(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> pt_bo = &pt->bo;
> pt_bo->parent = amdgpu_bo_ref(cursor->parent->base.bo);
> amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init(&entry->base, vm, pt_bo);
> - if (cursor->level < AMDGPU_VM_PTB)
> - entry->entries = pt->entries;
> - else
> - entry->entries = NULL;
>
> r = amdgpu_vm_clear_bo(adev, vm, pt, immediate);
> if (r)
> @@ -1017,6 +1021,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_free_table(struct amdgpu_vm_pt *entry)
> amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
> amdgpu_bo_unref(&entry->base.bo);
> }
> + kvfree(entry->entries);
> entry->entries = NULL;
> }
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list