[PATCH v2 04/22] drm: Don't test for IRQ support in VBLANK ioctls
Thomas Zimmermann
tzimmermann at suse.de
Wed Jun 23 06:43:07 UTC 2021
Hi Liviu
Am 22.06.21 um 17:25 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> For KMS drivers, replace the IRQ check in VBLANK ioctls with a check for
>> vblank support. IRQs might be enabled wthout vblanking being supported.
>>
>> This change also removes the DRM framework's only dependency on IRQ state
>> for non-legacy drivers. For legacy drivers with userspace modesetting,
>> the original test remains in drm_wait_vblank_ioctl().
>>
>> v2:
>> * keep the old test for legacy drivers in
>> drm_wait_vblank_ioctl() (Daniel)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 10 +++-------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> index c3bd664ea733..1d7785721323 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> @@ -74,10 +74,8 @@
>> * only supports devices with a single interrupt on the main device stored in
>> * &drm_device.dev and set as the device paramter in drm_dev_alloc().
>> *
>> - * These IRQ helpers are strictly optional. Drivers which roll their own only
>> - * need to set &drm_device.irq_enabled to signal the DRM core that vblank
>> - * interrupts are working. Since these helpers don't automatically clean up the
>> - * requested interrupt like e.g. devm_request_irq() they're not really
>> + * These IRQ helpers are strictly optional. Since these helpers don't automatically
>> + * clean up the requested interrupt like e.g. devm_request_irq() they're not really
>> * recommended.
>> */
>>
>> @@ -91,9 +89,7 @@
>> * and after the installation.
>> *
>> * This is the simplified helper interface provided for drivers with no special
>> - * needs. Drivers which need to install interrupt handlers for multiple
>> - * interrupts must instead set &drm_device.irq_enabled to signal the DRM core
>> - * that vblank interrupts are available.
>> + * needs.
>> *
>> * @irq must match the interrupt number that would be passed to request_irq(),
>> * if called directly instead of using this helper function.
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> index 3417e1ac7918..a98a4aad5037 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
>> @@ -1748,8 +1748,13 @@ int drm_wait_vblank_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>> unsigned int pipe_index;
>> unsigned int flags, pipe, high_pipe;
>>
>> - if (!dev->irq_enabled)
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET)) {
>> + if (!drm_dev_has_vblank(dev))
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + } else {
>> + if (!dev->irq_enabled)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>
> For a system call that is used quite a lot by userspace we have increased the code size
> in a noticeable way. Can we not cache it privately?
I'm not quite sure that I understand your concern. The additionally
called functions are trivial one-liners; probably inlined anyway.
However, irq_enabled is only relevant for legacy drivers and will
eventually disappear behind CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY. We can rewrite the test
like this:
ifdef CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY
if (unlikely(check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))) {
if (!irq_enabled)
return;
} else
#endif
{
if (!has_vblank_support(dev))
return;
}
As CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY is most likely disabled on concurrent systems, we'd
get a single test for the modern drivers. If DRM_LEGACYis on, the
compiler at least knows that the else branch is preferred.
Best regards
Thomas
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20210623/fea34d7a/attachment.sig>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list