[PATCH] drm/radeon: Use kvmalloc for CS chunks

Chen Li chenli at uniontech.com
Tue Mar 2 06:42:12 UTC 2021


The number of chunks/chunks_array may be passed in
by userspace and can be large.

It has been observed to cause kcalloc failures from trinity fuzzy test:

```
 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5487 at mm/page_alloc.c:4385
 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x14d0

......

Trace:
__warn.part.4+0x11c/0x174
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x14d0
warn_slowpath_null+0x84/0xb0
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x14d0
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2d8/0x14d0
alloc_pages_current+0xf0/0x1b0
free_buffer_head+0x88/0xf0
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers+0x1e0/0x2a0
ext4_releasepage+0x84/0x140
release_pages+0x414/0x4c0
release_pages+0x42c/0x4c0
__find_get_block+0x1a4/0x5b0
alloc_pages_current+0xcc/0x1b0
kmalloc_order+0x30/0xb0
__kmalloc+0x300/0x390
kmalloc_order_trace+0x48/0x110
__kmalloc+0x300/0x390
radeon_cs_parser_init.part.1+0x74/0x670 [radeon]
crypto_shash_update+0x5c/0x1c0
radeon_cs_parser_init.part.1+0x74/0x670 [radeon]
__wake_up_common_lock+0xb8/0x210
radeon_cs_ioctl+0xc8/0xb80 [radeon]
radeon_cs_ioctl+0x50/0xb80 [radeon]
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xf4/0x160
radeon_cs_ioctl+0x0/0xb80 [radeon]
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa0/0x160
drm_ioctl+0x2dc/0x4f0
radeon_drm_ioctl+0x80/0xf0 [radeon]
new_sync_write+0x120/0x1c0
timerqueue_add+0x88/0x140
do_vfs_ioctl+0xe4/0x990
ksys_ioctl+0xdc/0x110
ksys_ioctl+0x78/0x110
sys_ioctl+0x2c/0x50
entSys+0xa0/0xc0
```

Obviously, the required order in this case is larger than MAX_ORDER.
So, just use kvmalloc instead.

Signed-off-by: Chen Li <chenli at uniontech.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
index 35e937d39b51..fb736ef9f9aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ int radeon_cs_parser_init(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, void *data)
 	p->chunk_relocs = NULL;
 	p->chunk_flags = NULL;
 	p->chunk_const_ib = NULL;
-	p->chunks_array = kcalloc(cs->num_chunks, sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
+	p->chunks_array = kvmalloc_array(cs->num_chunks, sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (p->chunks_array == NULL) {
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ int radeon_cs_parser_init(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, void *data)
 	}
 	p->cs_flags = 0;
 	p->nchunks = cs->num_chunks;
-	p->chunks = kcalloc(p->nchunks, sizeof(struct radeon_cs_chunk), GFP_KERNEL);
+	p->chunks = kvmalloc_array(p->nchunks, sizeof(struct radeon_cs_chunk), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (p->chunks == NULL) {
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
@@ -452,8 +452,8 @@ static void radeon_cs_parser_fini(struct radeon_cs_parser *parser, int error, bo
 	kvfree(parser->vm_bos);
 	for (i = 0; i < parser->nchunks; i++)
 		kvfree(parser->chunks[i].kdata);
-	kfree(parser->chunks);
-	kfree(parser->chunks_array);
+	kvfree(parser->chunks);
+	kvfree(parser->chunks_array);
 	radeon_ib_free(parser->rdev, &parser->ib);
 	radeon_ib_free(parser->rdev, &parser->const_ib);
 }
--
2.30.0




More information about the amd-gfx mailing list