[PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: wrap kiq ring ops with kiq spinlock
Wang, Kevin(Yang)
Kevin1.Wang at amd.com
Mon Mar 15 10:32:15 UTC 2021
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
Hi Das,
It seems more reasonable to put spin lock in ring structure, so that KIQ ring can be treated like other normal ring.
and do we have other paths to call kiq ring except for kernel initialization? it seems the kfd and kgd will use kiq in one thread..
thanks.
Best Regards,
Kevin
________________________________
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at amd.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2021 1:08 AM
To: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
Cc: Das, Nirmoy <Nirmoy.Das at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: wrap kiq ring ops with kiq spinlock
KIQ ring is being operated by kfd as well as amdgpu.
KFD is using kiq lock, we should the same from amdgpu side
as well.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
index 1915b9b95106..892dc6b269fb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
@@ -462,20 +462,25 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_disable_kcq(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq;
struct amdgpu_ring *kiq_ring = &kiq->ring;
- int i;
+ int i, r;
if (!kiq->pmf || !kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues)
return -EINVAL;
+ spin_lock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->unmap_queues_size *
- adev->gfx.num_compute_rings))
+ adev->gfx.num_compute_rings)) {
+ spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; i++)
kiq->pmf->kiq_unmap_queues(kiq_ring, &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i],
RESET_QUEUES, 0, 0);
+ r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
+ spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
- return amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
+ return r;
}
int amdgpu_queue_mask_bit_to_set_resource_bit(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
@@ -518,12 +523,13 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_enable_kcq(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
DRM_INFO("kiq ring mec %d pipe %d q %d\n", kiq_ring->me, kiq_ring->pipe,
kiq_ring->queue);
-
+ spin_lock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(kiq_ring, kiq->pmf->map_queues_size *
adev->gfx.num_compute_rings +
kiq->pmf->set_resources_size);
if (r) {
DRM_ERROR("Failed to lock KIQ (%d).\n", r);
+ spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
return r;
}
@@ -532,6 +538,7 @@ int amdgpu_gfx_enable_kcq(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
kiq->pmf->kiq_map_queues(kiq_ring, &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i]);
r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(kiq_ring);
+ spin_unlock(&adev->gfx.kiq.ring_lock);
if (r)
DRM_ERROR("KCQ enable failed\n");
--
2.30.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&data=04%7C01%7CKevin1.Wang%40amd.com%7C0a90c6383d634a5226a108d8e5797c08%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637511657234189238%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=sfa27Sz8wcIyHJqaE9f8aXQMeUxbyynpAONZHUYoogY%3D&reserved=0
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20210315/b4385a74/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list