[PATCH] drm/dp_mst: Enhance DP MST topology logging

Lyude Paul lyude at redhat.com
Thu Mar 18 23:16:14 UTC 2021


(going to try to take a look at this tomorrow JFYI)

On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 11:55 -0400, Eryk Brol wrote:
> [why]
> MST topology print was missing fec logging and pdt printed
> as an int wasn't clear. vcpi and payload info were also logged as an
> arbitrary series of ints which require the user to know the ordering
> of the prints, making the logs difficult to use.
> 
> [how]
> -add fec logging
> -add pdt parsing into strings
> -format vcpi and payload info into tables with headings
> -clean up topology prints
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eryk Brol <eryk.brol at amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 932c4641ec3e..3afeaa59cbaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -4720,6 +4720,24 @@ static void drm_dp_mst_kick_tx(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
>         queue_work(system_long_wq, &mgr->tx_work);
>  }
>  
> +static char *pdt_to_string(u8 pdt)
> +{
> +       switch (pdt) {
> +       case DP_PEER_DEVICE_NONE:
> +               return "NONE";
> +       case DP_PEER_DEVICE_SOURCE_OR_SST:
> +               return "SOURCE OR SST";
> +       case DP_PEER_DEVICE_MST_BRANCHING:
> +               return "MST BRANCHING";
> +       case DP_PEER_DEVICE_SST_SINK:
> +               return "SST SINK";
> +       case DP_PEER_DEVICE_DP_LEGACY_CONV:
> +               return "DP LEGACY CONV";
> +       default:
> +               return "ERR";
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static void drm_dp_mst_dump_mstb(struct seq_file *m,
>                                  struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
>  {
> @@ -4732,9 +4750,20 @@ static void drm_dp_mst_dump_mstb(struct seq_file *m,
>                 prefix[i] = '\t';
>         prefix[i] = '\0';
>  
> -       seq_printf(m, "%smst: %p, %d\n", prefix, mstb, mstb->num_ports);
> +       seq_printf(m, "%smstb - [%p]: num_ports: %d\n", prefix, mstb, mstb-
> >num_ports);
>         list_for_each_entry(port, &mstb->ports, next) {
> -               seq_printf(m, "%sport: %d: input: %d: pdt: %d, ddps: %d ldps:
> %d, sdp: %d/%d, %p, conn: %p\n", prefix, port->port_num, port->input, port-
> >pdt, port->ddps, port->ldps, port->num_sdp_streams, port-
> >num_sdp_stream_sinks, port, port->connector);
> +               seq_printf(m, "%sport %d - [%p] (%s - %s): ddps: %d, ldps: %d,
> sdp: %d/%d, fec: %s, conn: %p\n",
> +                               prefix,
> +                               port->port_num,
> +                               port,
> +                               port->input ? "input" : "output",
> +                               pdt_to_string(port->pdt),
> +                               port->ddps,
> +                               port->ldps,
> +                               port->num_sdp_streams,
> +                               port->num_sdp_stream_sinks,
> +                               port->fec_capable ? "true" : "false",
> +                               port->connector);
>                 if (port->mstb)
>                         drm_dp_mst_dump_mstb(m, port->mstb);
>         }
> @@ -4787,33 +4816,39 @@ void drm_dp_mst_dump_topology(struct seq_file *m,
>         mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
>  
>         mutex_lock(&mgr->payload_lock);
> -       seq_printf(m, "vcpi: %lx %lx %d\n", mgr->payload_mask, mgr->vcpi_mask,
> -               mgr->max_payloads);
> +       seq_printf(m, "\n *** VCPI Info ***\npayload_mask: %lx, vcpi_mask:
> %lx, max_payloads: %d\n",
> +                       mgr->payload_mask,
> +                       mgr->vcpi_mask,
> +                       mgr->max_payloads);
>  
> +       seq_printf(m, "\n|   idx   |  port # |  vcp_id | # slots |     sink
> name     |\n");
>         for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
>                 if (mgr->proposed_vcpis[i]) {
>                         char name[14];
>  
>                         port = container_of(mgr->proposed_vcpis[i], struct
> drm_dp_mst_port, vcpi);
>                         fetch_monitor_name(mgr, port, name, sizeof(name));
> -                       seq_printf(m, "vcpi %d: %d %d %d sink name: %s\n", i,
> -                                  port->port_num, port->vcpi.vcpi,
> -                                  port->vcpi.num_slots,
> -                                  (*name != 0) ? name :  "Unknown");
> +                       seq_printf(m, "%10d%10d%10d%10d%20s\n",
> +                                       i,
> +                                       port->port_num,
> +                                       port->vcpi.vcpi,
> +                                       port->vcpi.num_slots,
> +                                       (*name != 0) ? name :  "Unknown");
>                 } else
> -                       seq_printf(m, "vcpi %d:unused\n", i);
> +                       seq_printf(m, "%6d - Unused\n", i);
>         }
> +       seq_printf(m, "\n *** Payload Info ***\n");
> +       seq_printf(m, "|   idx   |  state  |  start slot  | # slots |\n");
>         for (i = 0; i < mgr->max_payloads; i++) {
> -               seq_printf(m, "payload %d: %d, %d, %d\n",
> -                          i,
> -                          mgr->payloads[i].payload_state,
> -                          mgr->payloads[i].start_slot,
> -                          mgr->payloads[i].num_slots);
> -
> -
> +               seq_printf(m, "%10d%10d%15d%10d\n",
> +                               i,
> +                               mgr->payloads[i].payload_state,
> +                               mgr->payloads[i].start_slot,
> +                               mgr->payloads[i].num_slots);
>         }
>         mutex_unlock(&mgr->payload_lock);
>  
> +       seq_printf(m, "\n *** DPCD Info ***\n");
>         mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
>         if (mgr->mst_primary) {
>                 u8 buf[DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_SIZE];

-- 
Sincerely,
   Lyude Paul (she/her)
   Software Engineer at Red Hat
   
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
on my status. I don't bite!



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list