[RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Mar 19 17:55:18 UTC 2021


On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:24:07AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:32 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com>
> > > > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
> > > > > > > > happened here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of
> > > > > > > a previous one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge
> > > > > > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they
> > > > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches
> > > > > > show up, and then get pulled again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some
> > > > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they
> > > > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for the confusion here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, I see.  Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel
> > > >
> > > > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained.  Would
> > > > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order
> > > > please?
> > >
> > > It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again,
> > > they're also on this thread.
> > 
> > You're patches have made it into drm-next meanwhile, so they should
> > show up in linux-next through that tree at least. Except if that one
> > also has some trouble.
> 
> Thanks for letting me know.
> 
> I see some patches made it back in, others didn't.
> 
> I'll resend the stragglers - bear with.

The vmwgfx ones should all be back, the others I guess just werent ever
applied. I'll vacuum them all up if you resend. Apologies for the wobbly
ride.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list