[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove unreachable code
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue May 25 06:53:16 UTC 2021
Am 24.05.21 um 12:46 schrieb Jiapeng Chong:
> In the function amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(), every branch in the switch
> statement will have a return, so the code below the switch statement
> will not be executed.
>
> Eliminate the follow smatch warning:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:845 amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg() warn:
> ignoring unreachable code.
Mhm, that is a NAK. IIRC we explicitely added that code because some
compiler versions complained that we don't return a value at the end of
the function.
I suggest to drop the return from the default case and the BUG() instead.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci at linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> index 82f0542..375b346 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> @@ -842,8 +842,6 @@ static int amdgpu_uvd_cs_msg(struct amdgpu_uvd_cs_ctx *ctx,
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - BUG();
> - return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> /**
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list