[PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: cleanup and add TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY

[Christian König]

Am 31.05.21 um 11:52 schrieb Thomas Hellström (Intel):
> Hi, Lang,
>
> On 5/31/21 10:19 AM, Yu, Lang wrote:
>> [Public]
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> On 5/27/21 3:30 AM, Lang Yu wrote:
>>>> Make TTM_PL_FLAG_* start from zero and add
>>>> TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY flag for temporary
>>>> GTT allocation use.
>>> GTT is a driver private acronym, right? And it doesn't look like
>>> TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY will be used in core TTM, so should we instead 
>>> set
>>> aside a mask in the PL flag for driver-private use?
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments and advice, GTT means Graphics Translation 
>> Table here, seems
>> a general acronym. TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY may also be used by other 
>> drives.
>> I have made other patches for this. Please help review.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lang
>>
> My point was really that the flag naming and documentation should 
> reflect what core ttm is doing with that flag. If there is no specific 
> core TTM usage, IMO we should move it to a driver specific flag to 
> avoid future confusion. In particular a writer of a generic TTM 
> resource manager should be able to know without looking at an old 
> commit message what the placement flag is intended for.
>
> So here we add a flag where core TTM forces a bo move on validate and 
> that's it. And that appears to be how it's used when an amdgpu bo is 
> evicted to GTT, (btw should it be accounted in this situation?)
>
> The other use is to force the amdgpu driver to temporarily accept it 
> into GTT when there is a lack of space, and IMHO that's a driver 
> specific use and we should allocate a mask for driver specific flags 
> for that.
>
> So shouldn't this be two flags, really?

Well one flag makes sense for the use case at hand that drivers want to 
signal to TTM that an allocation is only temporary and not considered valid.

That we then use this flag to implement temporary GTT allocations to 
avoid problems during eviction is just extending that use case.

Christian.

>
> TTM_PL_FLAG_FORCE_MOVE
>
> and
>
> AMDGPU_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY
>
> Thanks,
>
> /Thomas
>
>>> Thomas
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Yu, Lang <Lang.Yu at amd.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 9:31 AM
>>> To: amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Cc: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>; Huang, Ray
>>> <Ray.Huang at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>;
>>> Yu, Lang <Lang.Yu at amd.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/ttm: cleanup and add TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY
>>>
>>> Make TTM_PL_FLAG_* start from zero and add TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY flag
>>> for temporary GTT allocation use.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <Lang.Yu at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h | 5 +++--
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h
>>> b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h index aa6ba4d0cf78..9f5cfc7c2d5a 
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h
>>> @@ -47,8 +47,9 @@
>>>   * top of the memory area, instead of the bottom.
>>>   */
>>>
>>> -#define TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS  (1 << 19)
>>> -#define TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN     (1 << 22)
>>> +#define TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS  (1 << 0)
>>> +#define TTM_PL_FLAG_TOPDOWN     (1 << 1)
>>> +#define TTM_PL_FLAG_TEMPORARY   (1 << 2)
>>>
>>> /**
>>>   * struct ttm_place
>>> -- 
>>> 2.25.1
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx