[PATCH] drm/amd/pm: avoid duplicate powergate/ungate setting
Lazar, Lijo
lijo.lazar at amd.com
Fri Nov 12 08:45:59 UTC 2021
On 11/11/2021 1:27 PM, Evan Quan wrote:
> Just bail out if the target IP block is already in the desired
> powergate/ungate state. This can avoid some duplicate settings
> which sometimes may cause unexpected issues.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YV81vidWQLWvATMM@zn.tnic/
>
> Change-Id: I66346c69f121df0f5ee20182451313ae4fda2d04
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de>
> --
> v1->v2:
> - typo fix and add link for the issue referred in commit
> message(Paul/Boris)
> - update the data type to uint32_t(Paul)
> - better Macro naming(Lijo)
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_dpm.h | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 0bd90ec9e43e..fca592394fa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -3508,6 +3508,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> adev->rmmio_size = pci_resource_len(adev->pdev, 2);
> }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_NUM; i++)
> + atomic_set(&adev->pm.pwr_state[i], POWER_STATE_UNKNOWN);
> +
> adev->rmmio = ioremap(adev->rmmio_base, adev->rmmio_size);
> if (adev->rmmio == NULL) {
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h
> index f1a46d16f7ea..4b9e68a79f06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ enum amd_ip_block_type {
> AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_ACP,
> AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCN,
> AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_MES,
> - AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_JPEG
> + AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_JPEG,
> + AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_NUM,
> };
>
> enum amd_clockgating_state {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> index 03581d5b1836..40fda199a86f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
> @@ -927,6 +927,13 @@ int amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t block
> {
> int ret = 0;
> const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
> + enum ip_power_state pwr_state = gate ? POWER_STATE_OFF : POWER_STATE_ON;
> +
> + if (atomic_read(&adev->pm.pwr_state[block_type]) == pwr_state) {
> + dev_dbg(adev->dev, "IP block%d already in the target %s state!",
> + block_type, gate ? "gate" : "ungate");
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> switch (block_type) {
> case AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD:
> @@ -976,9 +983,12 @@ int amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t block
> }
> break;
> default:
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
IP blocks which were not handled by PMFW were default pass before. Will
this be a problem or return 0 here to keep the legacy behavior?
Thanks,
Lijo
> }
>
> + if (!ret)
> + atomic_set(&adev->pm.pwr_state[block_type], pwr_state);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_dpm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_dpm.h
> index 98f1b3d8c1d5..16e3f72d31b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_dpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/amdgpu_dpm.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,12 @@ struct amdgpu_dpm {
> enum amd_dpm_forced_level forced_level;
> };
>
> +enum ip_power_state {
> + POWER_STATE_UNKNOWN,
> + POWER_STATE_ON,
> + POWER_STATE_OFF,
> +};
> +
> struct amdgpu_pm {
> struct mutex mutex;
> u32 current_sclk;
> @@ -452,6 +458,8 @@ struct amdgpu_pm {
> struct i2c_adapter smu_i2c;
> struct mutex smu_i2c_mutex;
> struct list_head pm_attr_list;
> +
> + atomic_t pwr_state[AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_NUM];
> };
>
> #define R600_SSTU_DFLT 0
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list