[PATCH 1/2] drm: Add Gamma and Degamma LUT sizes props to drm_crtc to validate.
Sean Paul
sean at poorly.run
Sat Oct 2 14:28:23 UTC 2021
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:39:25PM -0400, Mark Yacoub wrote:
> > From: Mark Yacoub <markyacoub at google.com>
> >
> > [Why]
> > 1. drm_atomic_helper_check doesn't check for the LUT sizes of either Gamma
> > or Degamma props in the new CRTC state, allowing any invalid size to
> > be passed on.
> > 2. Each driver has its own LUT size, which could also be different for
> > legacy users.
> >
> > [How]
> > 1. Create |degamma_lut_size| and |gamma_lut_size| to save the LUT sizes
> > assigned by the driver when it's initializing its color and CTM
> > management.
> > 2. Create drm_atomic_helper_check_crtc which is called by
> > drm_atomic_helper_check to check the LUT sizes saved in drm_crtc that
> > they match the sizes in the new CRTC state.
> >
>
> Did you consider extending drm_color_lut_check() with the size checks?
>
> > Fixes: igt at kms_color@pipe-A-invalid-gamma-lut-sizes on MTK
> > Tested on Zork(amdgpu) and Jacuzzi(mediatek)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Yacoub<markyacoub at chromium.org>
>
> nit: missing a space between name and email
>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c | 2 ++
> > include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h | 1 +
> > include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 11 ++++++
> > 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > index 2c0c6ec928200..265b9747250d1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c
> > @@ -930,6 +930,58 @@ drm_atomic_helper_check_planes(struct drm_device *dev,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_check_planes);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * drm_atomic_helper_check_planes - validate state object for CRTC changes
>
> Ctrl+c/Ctrl+v error here
>
> > + * @state: the driver state object
> > + *
> > + * Check the CRTC state object such as the Gamma/Degamma LUT sizes if the new
>
> Are there missing words between "object" and "such"?
>
> > + * state holds them.
> > + *
> > + * RETURNS:
> > + * Zero for success or -errno
> > + */
> > +int drm_atomic_helper_check_crtc(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>
> drm_atomic_helper_check_crtcs to be consistent with
> drm_atomic_helper_check_planes
>
> > +{
> > + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > + struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state (state, crtc, new_crtc_state, i) {
>
> no space before (
Ignore this, parsing error on my behalf.
>
> > + if (new_crtc_state->gamma_lut) {
>
> Perhaps gate these with a check of state->color_mgmt_changed first?
>
> > + uint64_t supported_lut_size = crtc->gamma_lut_size;
> > + uint32_t supported_legacy_lut_size = crtc->gamma_size;
> > + uint32_t new_state_lut_size =
> > + drm_color_lut_size(new_crtc_state->gamma_lut);
>
> nit: new_state_lut_size and supported_lut_size can be pulled out to top level scope
> to avoid re-instantiation on each iteration
>
> > +
> > + if (new_state_lut_size != supported_lut_size &&
> > + new_state_lut_size != supported_legacy_lut_size) {
>
> According to the docbook, "If drivers support multiple LUT sizes then they
> should publish the largest size, and sub-sample smaller sized LUTs". So
> should this check be > instead of != ?
>
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
>
> drm_dbg_state() is probably more appropriate
>
> > + "Invalid Gamma LUT size. Should be %u (or %u for legacy) but got %u.\n",
> > + supported_lut_size,
> > + supported_legacy_lut_size,
> > + new_state_lut_size);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (new_crtc_state->degamma_lut) {
> > + uint32_t new_state_lut_size =
> > + drm_color_lut_size(new_crtc_state->degamma_lut);
> > + uint64_t supported_lut_size = crtc->degamma_lut_size;
> > +
> > + if (new_state_lut_size != supported_lut_size) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
>
> drm_dbg_state()
>
> > + "Invalid Degamma LUT size. Should be %u but got %u.\n",
> > + supported_lut_size, new_state_lut_size);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_helper_check_crtc);
> > +
> > /**
> > * drm_atomic_helper_check - validate state object
> > * @dev: DRM device
> > @@ -975,6 +1027,10 @@ int drm_atomic_helper_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > + ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_crtc(state);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > if (state->legacy_cursor_update)
> > state->async_update = !drm_atomic_helper_async_check(dev, state);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c
> > index bb14f488c8f6c..72a1b628e7cdd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_color_mgmt.c
> > @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ void drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
> >
> > if (degamma_lut_size) {
> > + crtc->degamma_lut_size = degamma_lut_size;
> > drm_object_attach_property(&crtc->base,
> > config->degamma_lut_property, 0);
> > drm_object_attach_property(&crtc->base,
> > @@ -178,6 +179,7 @@ void drm_crtc_enable_color_mgmt(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > config->ctm_property, 0);
> >
> > if (gamma_lut_size) {
> > + crtc->gamma_lut_size = gamma_lut_size;
> > drm_object_attach_property(&crtc->base,
> > config->gamma_lut_property, 0);
> > drm_object_attach_property(&crtc->base,
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
> > index 4045e2507e11c..3eda13622ca1e 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h
> > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct drm_atomic_state;
> > struct drm_private_obj;
> > struct drm_private_state;
> >
> > +int drm_atomic_helper_check_crtc(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> > int drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> > int drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(struct drm_plane_state *plane_state,
> > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > index 13eeba2a750af..c602be2cafca9 100644
> > --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h
> > @@ -1072,6 +1072,17 @@ struct drm_crtc {
> > /** @funcs: CRTC control functions */
> > const struct drm_crtc_funcs *funcs;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * @degamma_lut_size: Size of degamma LUT.
> > + */
> > + uint32_t degamma_lut_size;
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * @gamma_lut_size: Size of Gamma LUT. Not used by legacy userspace such as
> > + * X, which doesn't support large lut sizes.
> > + */
> > + uint32_t gamma_lut_size;
> > +
>
> Above, you're checking
>
> if (new_state_lut_size != gamma_size && new_state_lut_size != gamma_lut_size)
> fail;
>
> doesn't that imply that gamma_size and gamma_lut_size must always be equal? If
> so, perhaps turf this new state and rename degamma_lut_size to degamma_size to
> be consistent.
Yeah... so not sure what I was thinking when I wrote this, but my brain decided
to remind me this was wrong last night while I was trying to fall asleep (thanks
for checking in, brain). I still think perhaps the naming could be improved here
to more clearly delineate legacy from current.
Apologies for the churn.
>
> De-duping this and initializing crtc->gamma_size in the initialization would
> mean the if (crtc->gamma_size) check in drm_crtc_supports_legacy_check() is no
> longer useful (and possibly other similar checks), so some care will need to be
> taken to avoid regression. I think the effort is worthwhile to avoid introducing
> new state.
>
>
>
> > /**
> > * @gamma_size: Size of legacy gamma ramp reported to userspace. Set up
> > * by calling drm_mode_crtc_set_gamma_size().
> > --
> > 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
> >
>
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list