[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix the hang observed on Carrizo due to UVD suspend failure

Lazar, Lijo lijo.lazar at amd.com
Mon Oct 18 07:57:35 UTC 2021



On 10/18/2021 1:04 PM, Evan Quan wrote:
> It's confirmed that on some APUs the interaction with SMU(about DPM disablement)
> will power off the UVD. That will make the succeeding interactions with UVD on the
> suspend path impossible. And the system will hang due to that. To workaround the
> issue, we will skip the UVD(or VCE) power off during interaction with SMU for
> suspend scenario.
> 

The original issue reported by Boris is related to sytem reboot and 
hw_fini calls (SMU is hw_fini before UVD/VCE). Boris also mentioned that 
it got solved by reverting the disable DPM calls during hw_fini. So, I'm 
still not sure how this is related to suspend path.

Thanks,
Lijo

> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> Change-Id: I7804d3835aadbc7cf4b686da4994e83333461748
> ---
>   .../powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_clockpowergating.c   | 20 +++++++++++++++++--
>   .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu8_hwmgr.c   | 16 +++++++++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/kv_dpm.c     |  4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_clockpowergating.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_clockpowergating.c
> index f2bda3bcbbde..d2c6fe8fe473 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_clockpowergating.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_clockpowergating.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,17 @@ static int smu7_update_vce_dpm(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, bool bgate)
>   
>   int smu7_powerdown_uvd(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   {
> -	if (phm_cf_want_uvd_power_gating(hwmgr))
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)hwmgr->adev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Further inactions with UVD are still needed on the suspend path. Thus
> +	 * the power off for UVD here should be avoided.
> +	 *
> +	 * TODO: a better solution is to reorg the action chains performed on suspend
> +	 * and make the action here the last one. But that will involve a lot and needs
> +	 * MM team's help.
> +	 */
> +	if (phm_cf_want_uvd_power_gating(hwmgr) && !adev->in_suspend)
>   		return smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr,
>   				PPSMC_MSG_UVDPowerOFF,
>   				NULL);
> @@ -82,7 +92,13 @@ static int smu7_powerup_uvd(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   
>   static int smu7_powerdown_vce(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   {
> -	if (phm_cf_want_vce_power_gating(hwmgr))
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)hwmgr->adev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Further inactions with VCE are still needed on the suspend path. Thus
> +	 * the power off for VCE here should be avoided.
> +	 */
> +	if (phm_cf_want_vce_power_gating(hwmgr) && !adev->in_suspend)
>   		return smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr,
>   				PPSMC_MSG_VCEPowerOFF,
>   				NULL);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu8_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu8_hwmgr.c
> index b94a77e4e714..09e755980c42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu8_hwmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu8_hwmgr.c
> @@ -1247,7 +1247,13 @@ static int smu8_dpm_force_dpm_level(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
>   
>   static int smu8_dpm_powerdown_uvd(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   {
> -	if (PP_CAP(PHM_PlatformCaps_UVDPowerGating))
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)hwmgr->adev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Further inactions with UVD are still needed on the suspend path. Thus
> +	 * the power off for UVD here should be avoided.
> +	 */
> +	if (PP_CAP(PHM_PlatformCaps_UVDPowerGating) && !adev->in_suspend)
>   		return smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_UVDPowerOFF, NULL);
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -1301,7 +1307,13 @@ static int  smu8_dpm_update_vce_dpm(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   
>   static int smu8_dpm_powerdown_vce(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>   {
> -	if (PP_CAP(PHM_PlatformCaps_VCEPowerGating))
> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)hwmgr->adev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Further inactions with VCE are still needed on the suspend path. Thus
> +	 * the power off for VCE here should be avoided.
> +	 */
> +	if (PP_CAP(PHM_PlatformCaps_VCEPowerGating) && !adev->in_suspend)
>   		return smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr,
>   					    PPSMC_MSG_VCEPowerOFF,
>   					    NULL);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/kv_dpm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/kv_dpm.c
> index bcae42cef374..4e9c9da255a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/kv_dpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/kv_dpm.c
> @@ -1683,7 +1683,7 @@ static void kv_dpm_powergate_uvd(void *handle, bool gate)
>   		amdgpu_device_ip_set_powergating_state(adev, AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD,
>   						       AMD_PG_STATE_GATE);
>   		kv_update_uvd_dpm(adev, gate);
> -		if (pi->caps_uvd_pg)
> +		if (pi->caps_uvd_pg && !adev->in_suspend)
>   			/* power off the UVD block */
>   			amdgpu_kv_notify_message_to_smu(adev, PPSMC_MSG_UVDPowerOFF);
>   	} else {
> @@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ static void kv_dpm_powergate_vce(void *handle, bool gate)
>   		amdgpu_device_ip_set_powergating_state(adev, AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE,
>   						       AMD_PG_STATE_GATE);
>   		kv_enable_vce_dpm(adev, false);
> -		if (pi->caps_vce_pg) /* power off the VCE block */
> +		if (pi->caps_vce_pg && !adev->in_suspend) /* power off the VCE block */
>   			amdgpu_kv_notify_message_to_smu(adev, PPSMC_MSG_VCEPowerOFF);
>   	} else {
>   		if (pi->caps_vce_pg) /* power on the VCE block */
> 


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list