[PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: Fix a race of IB test
Lazar, Lijo
lijo.lazar at amd.com
Mon Sep 13 04:00:43 UTC 2021
On 9/13/2021 5:18 AM, xinhui pan wrote:
> Direct IB submission should be exclusive. So use write lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> index 19323b4cce7b..be5d12ed3db1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> }
>
> /* Avoid accidently unparking the sched thread during GPU reset */
> - r = down_read_killable(&adev->reset_sem);
> + r = down_write_killable(&adev->reset_sem);
There are many ioctls and debugfs calls which takes this lock and as you
know the purpose is to avoid them while there is a reset. The purpose is
*not to* fix any concurrency issues those calls themselves have
otherwise and fixing those concurrency issues this way is just lazy and
not acceptable.
This will take away any fairness given to the writer in this rw lock and
that is supposed to be the reset thread.
Thanks,
Lijo
> if (r)
> return r;
>
> @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> kthread_unpark(ring->sched.thread);
> }
>
> - up_read(&adev->reset_sem);
> + up_write(&adev->reset_sem);
>
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list