Public patches but non-public development branch (Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdkfd: Add missing NULL check in svm_range_map_to_gpu)

[Paul Menzel]

Dear Christian,


Am 05.04.22 um 08:54 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 05.04.22 um 08:45 schrieb Paul Menzel:

>> Am 04.04.22 um 23:42 schrieb Philip Yang:
>>> bo_adev is NULL for system memory mapping to GPU.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 05fe8eeca92 (drm/amdgpu: fix TLB flushing during eviction)
>>
>> Sorry, where can I find that commit?
> 
> Well that's expected, the development branch is not public.

Well obviously, it was unexpected for me. How should I have known? Where 
is that documented? If the patches are publicly posted to the mailing 
list, why is that development branch not public?

The current situation is really frustrating for non-AMD employees. How 
can the current situation be improved?


Kind regards,

Paul


>> I do not see it in drm-next from agd5f git archive 
>> git at gitlab.freedesktop.org:agd5f/linux.git.
>>
>>     $ git log --oneline -1
>>     e45422695c19 (HEAD, agd5f/drm-next) drm/amdkfd: Create file 
>> descriptor after client is added to smi_clients list
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 2 +-
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> index 907b02045824..d3fb2d0b5a25 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
>>> @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ svm_range_map_to_gpu(struct kfd_process_device 
>>> *pdd, struct svm_range *prange,
>>>                          last_start, prange->start + i,
>>>                          pte_flags,
>>>                          last_start - prange->start,
>>> -                       bo_adev->vm_manager.vram_base_offset,
>>> +                       bo_adev ? 
>>> bo_adev->vm_manager.vram_base_offset : 0,
>>>                          NULL, dma_addr, &vm->last_update);
>>>             for (j = last_start - prange->start; j <= i; j++)