[PATCH] drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI

Lazar, Lijo lijo.lazar at amd.com
Mon Apr 11 09:47:22 UTC 2022



On 4/11/2022 2:55 PM, Quan, Evan wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only]
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar at amd.com>
>> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 5:05 PM
>> To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>;
>> arthur.marsh at internode.on.net
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: fix the deadlock issue observed on SI
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/2022 1:17 PM, Evan Quan wrote:
>>> By placing those unrelated code outside of adev->pm.mutex protections
>>> or restructuring the call flow, we can eliminate the deadlock issue.
>>> This comes with no real logics change.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3712e7a49459 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in
>>> amdgpu_dpm.c")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
>>> Change-Id: I75de4350d9c2517aba0d6adc12e1bc69430fd800
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c           | 39
>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c    | 10 -----
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c    | 35 -----------------
>>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c  | 10 -----
>>>    4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
>>> index 5504d81c77b7..72e7b5d40af6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/amdgpu_dpm.c
>>> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ int amdgpu_dpm_read_sensor(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev, enum amd_pp_sensors senso
>>>    void amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    {
>>>    	const struct amd_pm_funcs *pp_funcs = adev->powerplay.pp_funcs;
>>> +	int i;
>>>
>>>    	if (!adev->pm.dpm_enabled)
>>>    		return;
>>> @@ -434,6 +435,15 @@ void amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    	if (!pp_funcs->pm_compute_clocks)
>>>    		return;
>>>
>>> +	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
>>> +		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
>>> +		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
>>> +		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
>>> +			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>>    	pp_funcs->pm_compute_clocks(adev->powerplay.pp_handle);
>>>    	mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>> @@ -443,6 +453,20 @@ void amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> +	if (adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_SI) {
>>
>> Bringing family specific code to this layer is not the proper fix. Need to specify
>> what is the deadlock and why can't it be handled in family specific
>> implementation.
> [Quan, Evan] Please check V2. I added some details about this deadlock there.
> For those legacy ASICs, let's make the solution simple and straight forward.
> 

Now it does watermark programming outside of lock. I don't think that is 
the right assumption.

Thanks,
Lijo

> Thanks,
> Evan
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lijo
>>
>>> +		mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>> +		if (enable) {
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = true;
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.state =
>> POWER_STATE_TYPE_INTERNAL_UVD;
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = false;
>>> +		}
>>> +		mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>> +
>>> +		amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(adev);
>>> +		return;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	ret = amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(adev,
>> AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD, !enable);
>>>    	if (ret)
>>>    		DRM_ERROR("Dpm %s uvd failed, ret = %d. \n", @@ -453,6
>> +477,21 @@
>>> void amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
>>>    {
>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> +	if (adev->family == AMDGPU_FAMILY_SI) {
>>> +		mutex_lock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>> +		if (enable) {
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = true;
>>> +			/* XXX select vce level based on ring/task */
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_level =
>> AMD_VCE_LEVEL_AC_ALL;
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = false;
>>> +		}
>>> +		mutex_unlock(&adev->pm.mutex);
>>> +
>>> +		amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks(adev);
>>> +		return;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>    	ret = amdgpu_dpm_set_powergating_by_smu(adev,
>> AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE, !enable);
>>>    	if (ret)
>>>    		DRM_ERROR("Dpm %s vce failed, ret = %d. \n", diff --git
>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
>>> index 9613c6181c17..d3fe149d8476 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/legacy_dpm.c
>>> @@ -1028,16 +1028,6 @@ static int
>> amdgpu_dpm_change_power_state_locked(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    void amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(void *handle)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
>>> -	int i = 0;
>>> -
>>> -	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
>>> -		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
>>> -
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
>>> -		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
>>> -		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
>>> -			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
>>> -	}
>>>
>>>    	amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(adev);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
>>> index caae54487f9c..633dab14f51c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/legacy-dpm/si_dpm.c
>>> @@ -3892,40 +3892,6 @@ static int si_set_boot_state(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    }
>>>    #endif
>>>
>>> -static int si_set_powergating_by_smu(void *handle,
>>> -				     uint32_t block_type,
>>> -				     bool gate)
>>> -{
>>> -	struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
>>> -
>>> -	switch (block_type) {
>>> -	case AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_UVD:
>>> -		if (!gate) {
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = true;
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.state =
>> POWER_STATE_TYPE_INTERNAL_UVD;
>>> -		} else {
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.uvd_active = false;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(handle);
>>> -		break;
>>> -	case AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_VCE:
>>> -		if (!gate) {
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = true;
>>> -			/* XXX select vce level based on ring/task */
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_level =
>> AMD_VCE_LEVEL_AC_ALL;
>>> -		} else {
>>> -			adev->pm.dpm.vce_active = false;
>>> -		}
>>> -
>>> -		amdgpu_legacy_dpm_compute_clocks(handle);
>>> -		break;
>>> -	default:
>>> -		break;
>>> -	}
>>> -	return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static int si_set_sw_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    {
>>>    	return (amdgpu_si_send_msg_to_smc(adev,
>> PPSMC_MSG_SwitchToSwState) == PPSMC_Result_OK) ?
>>> @@ -8125,7 +8091,6 @@ static const struct amd_pm_funcs si_dpm_funcs
>> = {
>>>    	.print_power_state = &si_dpm_print_power_state,
>>>    	.debugfs_print_current_performance_level =
>> &si_dpm_debugfs_print_current_performance_level,
>>>    	.force_performance_level = &si_dpm_force_performance_level,
>>> -	.set_powergating_by_smu = &si_set_powergating_by_smu,
>>>    	.vblank_too_short = &si_dpm_vblank_too_short,
>>>    	.set_fan_control_mode = &si_dpm_set_fan_control_mode,
>>>    	.get_fan_control_mode = &si_dpm_get_fan_control_mode, diff --
>> git
>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
>>> index dbed72c1e0c6..1eb4e613b27a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/amd_powerplay.c
>>> @@ -1503,16 +1503,6 @@ static void pp_pm_compute_clocks(void
>> *handle)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr = handle;
>>>    	struct amdgpu_device *adev = hwmgr->adev;
>>> -	int i = 0;
>>> -
>>> -	if (adev->mode_info.num_crtc)
>>> -		amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update(adev);
>>> -
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; i++) {
>>> -		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
>>> -		if (ring && ring->sched.ready)
>>> -			amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
>>> -	}
>>>
>>>    	if (!amdgpu_device_has_dc_support(adev)) {
>>>    		amdgpu_dpm_get_active_displays(adev);
>>>


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list