[PATCH 0/8] drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit to Display Mode Library
Maíra Canal
mairacanal at riseup.net
Thu Aug 11 13:09:58 UTC 2022
On 8/11/22 08:22, Christian König wrote:
>
>
> Am 11.08.22 um 02:40 schrieb Tales Aparecida:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This series is the consolidation of an RFC sent earlier this year [RFC]
>> bringing unit testing to the AMDPGU driver. [gsoc]
>>
>> Our main goal is to bring unit testing to the AMD display driver; in
>> particular, we'll focus on the Display Mode Library (DML) for DCN2.0,
>> DMUB, and some of the DCE functions. This implementation intends to
>> help developers to recognize bugs before they are merged into the
>> mainline and also makes it possible for future code refactors of the
>> AMD display driver.
>>
>> For the implementation of the tests, we decided to go with the Kernel
>> Unit Testing Framework (KUnit). KUnit makes it possible to run test
>> suites on kernel boot or load the tests as a module. It reports all test
>> case results through a TAP (Test Anything Protocol) in the kernel log.
>> Moreover, KUnit unifies the test structure and provides tools to
>> simplify the testing for developers and CI systems.
>>
>> In regards to CI pipelines, we believe kunit_tool[kunit_tool] provides
>> ease of use, but we are also working on integrating KUnit into IGT, for
>> those already depending on the tool [igt_patch].
>>
>> We've chosen what we believe to be the simplest approach to integrate
>> KUnit tests into amdgpu [kunit_static]. We took into consideration that
>> this driver relies heavily on static functions with complex behavior
>> which would benefit from unit testing, otherwise, black-box tested
>> through public functions with dozens of arguments and sometimes high
>> cyclomatic complexity. Further than that, this approach also helps
>> beginners by avoiding the need to edit any Makefiles. Other approaches
>> are available and we would gladly receive feedback on this matter.
>
> Yeah, that approach immediately trigger goosebumps for me. We should
> absolutely not do that.
>
> The static functions are subject to change and we shouldn't need to
> change the unit tests when only the internals change.
I agree with you that ideally, we should not test static functions. But,
considering the scope of the AMD Display Core functions, it is pretty
hard to avoid it.
Most of the exposed functions on the AMD Display Core have dozens of
side effects and some functions pass the 500 lines. In this sense, it is
pretty hard to write a proper unit test for the function. If we think
through the theory of equivalence partition, when we have two
parameters, we have a simple area to analyze the boundary values and the
partition. If we have more than 4 parameters, we have a hyperplane with
dimension n to analyze, which means that finding the partitions and the
boundary values gets harder and harder.
In the Display Core, there are static functions with more than 50
parameters and the exposed functions call more the one static function,
so we might be analyzing more than 100 parameters, which I don't believe
is possible for a unit test.
In theory, I agree that we should not test the static functions. But,
considering the current scope of the AMD Display code, I don't believe
it is viable to test on the exposed functions.
Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal
>
> Instead black box testing and/or exposing tests as a separate module
> (e.g. for the fixed point calculations for example) is probably the way
> to go.
>
> Just my thoughts on this, essentially our display team has to take a look.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>>
>> The first three patches add KUnit represent what we intend to do on the
>> rest of the DML modules: systematic testing of the DML functions,
>> especially mathematically complicated functions. Also, it shows how
>> simple it is to add new tests to the DML.
>>
>> Among the tests, we highlight the dcn20_fpu_test, which, had it existed
>> then, could catch the defects introduced to dcn20_fpu.c by
>> 8861c27a6c [dcn20_bug] later fixed by 9ad5d02c2a [dcn20_fix].
>>
>> In this series, there's also an example of how unit tests can help avoid
>> regressions and keeping track of changes in behavior.
>>
>> Applying this series on top of the amd-staging-drm-next (2305916dca04)
>> and running its tests will result in a failure in the `dc_dmub_srv`
>> test, you can verify that with:
>>
>> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 \
>> --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests
>>
>> ```
>> ...
>> [20:19:00] # Subtest: populate_subvp_cmd_drr_info_test
>> [20:19:00] # populate_subvp_cmd_drr_info_test: pass:0 fail:5 skip:0
>> total:5
>> [20:19:00] not ok 1 - populate_subvp_cmd_drr_info_test
>> [20:19:00] ======== [FAILED] populate_subvp_cmd_drr_info_test =========
>> [20:19:00] # Subtest: dc_dmub_srv
>> [20:19:00] 1..1
>> [20:19:00] # Totals: pass:0 fail:5 skip:0 total:5
>> [20:19:00] not ok 8 - dc_dmub_srv
>> [20:19:00] =================== [FAILED] dc_dmub_srv ===================
>> [20:19:00] ============================================================
>> [20:19:00] Testing complete. Passed: 59, Failed: 5, Crashed: 0,
>> Skipped: 0, Errors: 0
>> ```
>> Full output at:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.riseup.net%2F%23SOggjANeLfbibdiHu2e_Ug&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kiaq3dfpSMiFGkMIXKHhHsMyr7o%2FuvKgny0ifF%2FzrmA%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> This is due to a known regression introduced by commit 5da7f4134357
>> ("drm/amd/display: fix 32 bit compilation errors in dc_dmub_srv.c")
>> [dmub_bug], which resulted in the struct's members being zero. As an
>> exercise, you can revert the offending patch and run the tests again,
>> but that would still result in failure, albeit with a different output.
>>
>> Full output when reverted:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.riseup.net%2F%23EEBgtgXjAmof5vZ_qs7_sg&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2Flv%2FAOosByeD8vPteKdqGqv2QHf50S6nTNTqma91fm8%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> This regression is currently being worked on [dmub_fix], and this
>> test-series will result in a success if applied alongside the
>> fix-series, particularly the patches 1-13/32.
>>
>> ```
>> [17:48:14] Testing complete. Passed: 64, Failed: 0, Crashed: 0,
>> Skipped: 0, Errors: 0
>> ```
>> Full successful output:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.riseup.net%2F%23migyN1Xpy3Gyq1it84HhNw&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zMOuzPypnx6oH9rMUYZwLpHELZd%2FaId4Tdh93LRr8bM%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> This series depends on a couple of Kunit patches already merged into
>> torvalds/master, which themselves depends on older patches:
>>
>> commit 61695f8c5d51 ("kunit: split resource API from test.h into new
>> resource.h")
>> commit 2852ca7fba9f ("panic: Taint kernel if tests are run")
>> commit cfc1d277891e ("module: Move all into module/")
>> commit cdebea6968fa ("kunit: split resource API impl from test.c into
>> new resource.c")
>> commit cae56e1740f5 ("kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for
>> clarity (s/subtest/suite)")
>> commit 1cdba21db2ca ("kunit: add ability to specify suite-level init
>> and exit functions")
>> commit c272612cb4a2 ("kunit: Taint the kernel when KUnit tests are run")
>> commit 3d6e44623841 ("kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions")
>> commit a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker
>> if OOM")
>> commit 1b11063d32d7 ("kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on
>> non-UML")
>> commit e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite**
>> in .kunit_test_suites")
>> commit 94681e289bf5 ("kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in
>> kunit_filter_tests")
>>
>> You can get a for branch ready for compilation at
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fisinyaaa%2Flinux%2F-%2Ftags%2Fintroduce-kunit-for-amd-v1&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hqIFUFjM1UDOTXYsckuoLP9nyxAvlVB4iCMs8FWkGnc%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your time taking a look and sending any feedback!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Isabella Basso, Magali Lemes, Maíra Canal, and Tales Aparecida
>>
>> [RFC]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Famd-gfx%2F20220608010709.272962-1-maira.canal%40usp.br%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XEk%2FNJacxlhjCymXuo3tVQHle9MtiSCKIOXyP%2B4Pa3M%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [gsoc]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsummerofcode.withgoogle.com%2Fprograms%2F2022%2Forganizations%2Fxorg-foundation&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZxjFnl5bjczfWxzpHOEKDU314QS4hmbIxTgvjPxqmJs%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [kunit_tool]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Flatest%2Fdev-tools%2Fkunit%2Fkunit-tool.html&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0jUQGUFKW8BVVgpD4sNkkLdqMn23X1S67y7Fj0RqZKY%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [igt_patch]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Farchives%2Figt-dev%2F2022-June%2F042895.html&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JmOfrDfQIWohsDCg%2F1BLyFckeG1CWfmM3NPwcpE5WFQ%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [kunit_static]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.kernel.org%2Fdev-tools%2Fkunit%2Fusage.html%23testing-static-functions&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IWA0KRuA1T3YCZIpq9JD8wTxE8gTZi%2B9aLJywU1Os4k%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [dcn20_bug]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Famd-gfx%2F20220603185042.3408844-6-Rodrigo.Siqueira%40amd.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b7B7QscRHX2STfVGRiE09RxYSvZTDLW59vi7lQTPrM0%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [dcn20_fix]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Famd-gfx%2F20220608164856.1870594-1-sunpeng.li%40amd.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yQR9AxoguAvVR%2BGni9GUhSdhgHKujcUXujFL30QZqAc%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [dmub_bug]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Famd-gfx%2F20220708052650.1029150-1-alexander.deucher%40amd.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752284993982%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WUb4zaBIhOd8oAjmcn19itKTbulUFepGfAtY%2FWLmrq8%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> [dmub_fix]
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Famd-gfx%2F20220805175826.2992171-14-chiahsuan.chung%40amd.com%2FT%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cb44787cd3628425b078d08da7b3213c7%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637957752285150231%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Z4AWumNHtXuHo8h7%2Fh%2Bdd0VqBQeywtbaD35pCKs0neQ%3D&reserved=0
>>
>>
>> Isabella Basso (1):
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce Kunit tests to display_rq_dlg_calc_20
>>
>> Magali Lemes (1):
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests for dcn20_fpu
>>
>> Maíra Canal (5):
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to the bw_fixed library
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to the display_mode_vba library
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit to dcn20/display_mode_vba_20 library
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests to dc_dmub_srv library
>> Documentation/gpu: Add Display Core Unit Test documentation
>>
>> Tales Aparecida (1):
>> drm/amd/display: Introduce KUnit tests for fixed31_32 library
>>
>> .../gpu/amdgpu/display/display-test.rst | 73 ++
>> Documentation/gpu/amdgpu/display/index.rst | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig | 25 +
>> .../drm/amd/display/dc/basics/fixpt31_32.c | 5 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dc_dmub_srv.c | 4 +
>> .../drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c | 3 +
>> .../drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu.c | 4 +
>> .../dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20.c | 4 +
>> .../dc/dml/dcn20/display_rq_dlg_calc_20.c | 4 +
>> .../drm/amd/display/dc/dml/display_mode_vba.c | 3 +
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/.kunitconfig | 7 +
>> .../dc/basics/dc_basics_fixpt31_32_test.c | 232 ++++++
>> .../amd/display/tests/dc/dc_dmub_srv_test.c | 285 +++++++
>> .../tests/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed_test.c | 323 ++++++++
>> .../tests/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu_test.c | 560 +++++++++++++
>> .../dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20_test.c | 227 ++++++
>> .../dml/dcn20/display_rq_dlg_calc_20_test.c | 112 +++
>> .../tests/dc/dml/display_mode_vba_test.c | 741 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 18 files changed, 2613 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/gpu/amdgpu/display/display-test.rst
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/.kunitconfig
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/basics/dc_basics_fixpt31_32_test.c
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dc_dmub_srv_test.c
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed_test.c
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dml/dcn20/dcn20_fpu_test.c
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dml/dcn20/display_mode_vba_20_test.c
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dml/dcn20/display_rq_dlg_calc_20_test.c
>>
>> create mode 100644
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/tests/dc/dml/display_mode_vba_test.c
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 2305916dca043ed69bd464f74a886b0216780aa6
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 83185f6c5da6070e7b0b608bc705a2d3bf295ae6
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 65407777e3bb20dfe5051f4f4cc7deb6a3c2ed34
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 60af3dadcfd4a778f10dd09fafbde6061d98528b
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 92d9259125f2982da5945be995b4ae2af1ca7c32
>> prerequisite-patch-id: f35acb6c07c0bd5496df919214351399d9aed5b5
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 8a9637d89966e51adfe11e3fd3d17fcf1328b472
>> prerequisite-patch-id: ea6f40f1cfb61fddb9d1562111897e184da49bf7
>> prerequisite-patch-id: ae79651ae7b2e02520b18fc7eded463afea757e5
>> prerequisite-patch-id: ba795b981f3e94890540f452e658e28408b500d2
>> prerequisite-patch-id: abd5e51f483a9afb08af468db043e2ebc7ce6867
>> prerequisite-patch-id: a31028824a461f8b4a6b9244035e246efbee9c71
>> prerequisite-patch-id: a65dfe200981f8584ba3b1f9813faa4f0022a13e
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list