[PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: fix overflow on MIN_I64 definition

Tales Aparecida tales.aparecida at gmail.com
Thu Aug 11 20:43:26 UTC 2022


From: David Gow <davidgow at google.com>

The definition of MIN_I64 in bw_fixed.c can cause gcc to whinge about
integer overflow, because it is treated as a positive value, which is
then negated. The temporary positive value is not necessarily
representable.

This causes the following warning:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c:30:19:
warning: integer overflow in expression ‘-9223372036854775808’ of type
‘long long int’ results in ‘-9223372036854775808’ [-Woverflow]
  30 |         (int64_t)(-(1LL << 63))
     |                   ^

Writing out (-MAX_I64 - 1) works instead.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow at google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tales Aparecida <tales.aparecida at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c
index 6ca288fb5fb9..2d46bc527b21 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/calcs/bw_fixed.c
@@ -26,12 +26,12 @@
 #include "bw_fixed.h"
 
 
-#define MIN_I64 \
-	(int64_t)(-(1LL << 63))
-
 #define MAX_I64 \
 	(int64_t)((1ULL << 63) - 1)
 
+#define MIN_I64 \
+	(-MAX_I64 - 1)
+
 #define FRACTIONAL_PART_MASK \
 	((1ULL << BW_FIXED_BITS_PER_FRACTIONAL_PART) - 1)
 
-- 
2.37.0



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list