[PATCH 05/18] drm/amd/display: Use mdelay to avoid crashes

Alex Hung alex.hung at amd.com
Wed Dec 14 22:55:56 UTC 2022



On 2022-12-14 15:35, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 5:25 PM Alex Hung <alex.hung at amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2022-12-14 14:54, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:50 PM Alex Hung <alex.hung at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2022-12-14 13:48, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 3:22 PM Aurabindo Pillai
>>>>> <aurabindo.pillai at amd.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Alex Hung <alex.hung at amd.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Why]
>>>>>> When running IGT kms_bw test with DP monitor, some systems crash from
>>>>>> msleep no matter how long or short the time is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [How]
>>>>>> To replace msleep with mdelay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide a bit more info about the crash?  A lot of platforms
>>>>> don't support delay larger than 2-4ms so this change will generate
>>>>> errors on ARM and possibly other platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> The msleep was introduced in eec3303de3378 for non-compliant display
>>>> port monitors but IGT's kms_bw test can cause a recent h/w to hang at
>>>> msleep(60) when calling "igt_remove_fb" in IGT
>>>> (https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Figt-gpu-tools%2F-%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Ftests%2Fkms_bw.c%23L197&data=05%7C01%7Calex.hung%40amd.com%7Cef40490c3d0f4a0448a808dade239493%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638066541657914573%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kx7mnbuN%2BhmIPEgj4l1cuek0nvqK16Ig3fWAHopA8CI%3D&reserved=0)
>>>>
>>>> It is possible to workaround this by reversing order of
>>>> igt_remove_fb(&buffer[i]), as the following example:
>>>>
>>>>      igt_create_color_fb with the order buffer[0], buffer[1], buffer[2]
>>>>
>>>> Hangs:
>>>>      igt_remove_fb with the order buffer[0], buffer[1], buffer[2]
>>>>
>>>> No hangs:
>>>>      igt_remove_fb with the reversed order buffer[2], buffer[1], buffer[0]
>>>>
>>>> However, IGT simply exposes the problem and it makes more sense to stop
>>>> the hang from occurring.
>>>>
>>>> I also tried to remove the msleep completely and it also work, but I
>>>> didn't want to break the fix for the original problematic hardware
>>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> Why does sleep vs delay make a difference?  Is there some race that we
>>> are not locking against?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>
>> That was my original thought but I did not find any previously. I will
>> investigate it again.
>>
>> If mdelay(>4) isn't usable on other platforms, is it an option to use
>> mdelay on x86_64 only and keep msleep on other platforms or just remove
>> the msleep for other platforms, something like
>>
>> -                       msleep(60);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> +                       mdelay(60);
>> +#endif
> 
> That's pretty ugly.  I'd rather try and resolve the root cause.  How
> important is the IGT test?  What does it do?  Is the test itself
> correct?
> 

Agreed, and I didn't want to add conditions around the mdelay for the 
same reason. I will assume this is not an option now.

As in the previous comment, IGT can be modified to avoid the crash by 
reversing the order fb is removed - though I suspect I will receive 
questions why this is not fixed in kernel.

I wanted to fix this in kernel because nothing stops other user-space 
applications to use the same way to crash kernel, so fixing IGT is the 
second option.

Apparently causing problems on other platforms isn't an option at all so 
I will try to figure out an non-mdelay solution, and then maybe an IGT 
solution instead.

> Alex
> 
> 
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai at amd.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung at amd.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira at amd.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>>>>>> index 913a1fe6b3da..e6251ccadb70 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c
>>>>>> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ void dce110_blank_stream(struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx)
>>>>>>                             * After output is idle pattern some sinks need time to recognize the stream
>>>>>>                             * has changed or they enter protection state and hang.
>>>>>>                             */
>>>>>> -                       msleep(60);
>>>>>> +                       mdelay(60);
>>>>>>                    } else if (pipe_ctx->stream->signal == SIGNAL_TYPE_EDP) {
>>>>>>                            if (!link->dc->config.edp_no_power_sequencing) {
>>>>>>                                    /*
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.39.0
>>>>>>


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list