[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue Feb 8 08:17:26 UTC 2022
I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going
wrong here :)
Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> handle = msg[2];
>
> if (handle == 0) {
> + radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
> return 0;
>
> default:
> -
> DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> - return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - BUG();
> + radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list