[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue Feb 8 08:17:26 UTC 2022


I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?

That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going 
wrong here :)

Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>   	handle = msg[2];
>
>   	if (handle == 0) {
> +		radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>   		DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>   		return 0;
>
>   	default:
> -
>   		DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
> -		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>
> -	BUG();
> +	radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>   	return -EINVAL;
>   }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
>



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list