[PATCH 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects
zhanglianjie
zhanglianjie at uniontech.com
Tue Feb 8 03:36:36 UTC 2022
Hi,
Thanks for your review. I have resubmitted, see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/7/2014
>
>
> Am 29.01.22 um 08:35 schrieb zhanglianjie:
>> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap
>> before the function returns.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> index 377f9cdb5b53..c5482f7793db 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>> handle = msg[2];
>>
>> if (handle == 0) {
>> + radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>> DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -559,11 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>> return 0;
>>
>> default:
>> -
>> DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>> BUG();
>
> That looks like it will trigger this BUG() now. Please also remove that
> line.
>
> Apart from that the patches look good to me.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list