[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

[zhanglianjie]

I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character coding 
problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?

> I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
> 
> That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going 
> wrong here :)
> 
> Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian.
> 
> Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
>> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap 
>> before the function returns.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>>       handle = msg[2];
>>
>>       if (handle == 0) {
>> +        radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>>           DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
>>           return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>>           return 0;
>>
>>       default:
>> -
>>           DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
>> -        return -EINVAL;
>>       }
>>
>> -    BUG();
>> +    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>>       return -EINVAL;
>>   }
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>>
>>
>>
> 
>