[PATCH v4 2/2] drm/radeon/uvd: Fix forgotten unmap buffer objects

[zhanglianjie]

Thank you very much for your review.

> I think so, Alex will probably pick that up.
> 
> Thanks,
> Christian.
> 
> Am 08.02.22 um 09:28 schrieb zhanglianjie:
>> I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character 
>> coding problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?
>>
>>> I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
>>>
>>> That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is 
>>> going wrong here :)
>>>
>>> Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>> Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
>>>> after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call 
>>>> radeon_bo_kunmap before the function returns.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie at uniontech.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c 
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>>>> index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
>>>> @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
>>>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>>>>       handle = msg[2];
>>>>
>>>>       if (handle == 0) {
>>>> +        radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>>>>           DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
>>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>>       }
>>>> @@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct 
>>>> radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
>>>>           return 0;
>>>>
>>>>       default:
>>>> -
>>>>           DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
>>>> -        return -EINVAL;
>>>>       }
>>>>
>>>> -    BUG();
>>>> +    radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
>>>>       return -EINVAL;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.20.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
>