[PATCH] drm/amdkfd: enable heavy-weight TLB flush on Arcturus

Russell, Kent Kent.Russell at amd.com
Wed Jan 19 15:03:57 UTC 2022


[AMD Official Use Only]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huang, JinHuiEric <JinHuiEric.Huang at amd.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 10:01 AM
> To: Russell, Kent <Kent.Russell at amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>;
> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: enable heavy-weight TLB flush on Arcturus
>
>
>
> On 2022-01-19 09:50, Russell, Kent wrote:
> > [AMD Official Use Only]
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 7:16 PM
> >> To: Russell, Kent <Kent.Russell at amd.com>; Huang, JinHuiEric
> >> <JinHuiEric.Huang at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: enable heavy-weight TLB flush on Arcturus
> >>
> >> Am 2022-01-18 um 7:08 p.m. schrieb Russell, Kent:
> >>> One question inline
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *KENT RUSSELL***
> >>>
> >>> Sr. Software Engineer | Linux Compute Kernel
> >>>
> >>> 1 Commerce Valley Drive East
> >>>
> >>> Markham, ON L3T 7X6
> >>>
> >>> *O*+(1) 289-695-2122**| Ext 72122
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> *From:* amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of
> >>> Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling at amd.com>
> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2022 6:36 PM
> >>> *To:* Huang, JinHuiEric <JinHuiEric.Huang at amd.com>;
> >>> amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: enable heavy-weight TLB flush on
> >>> Arcturus
> >>>
> >>> Am 2022-01-18 um 5:45 p.m. schrieb Eric Huang:
> >>>> SDMA FW fixes the hang issue for adding heavy-weight TLB
> >>>> flush on Arcturus, so we can enable it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Huang <jinhuieric.huang at amd.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c |  6 ------
> >>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c         | 10 ++++++++--
> >>>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> >>>> index a64cbbd943ba..acb4fd973e60 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> >>>> @@ -1892,12 +1892,6 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu(
> >>>>                                 true);
> >>>>         ret = unreserve_bo_and_vms(&ctx, false, false);
> >>>>
> >>>> -     /* Only apply no TLB flush on Aldebaran to
> >>>> -      * workaround regressions on other Asics.
> >>>> -      */
> >>>> -     if (table_freed && (adev->asic_type != CHIP_ALDEBARAN))
> >>>> -             *table_freed = true;
> >>>> -
> >>>>         goto out;
> >>>>
> >>>>   out_unreserve:
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
> >>>> index b570c0454ce9..485d4c52c7de 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c
> >>>> @@ -1596,6 +1596,12 @@ static int
> >>> kfd_ioctl_free_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep,
> >>>>         return ret;
> >>>>   }
> >>>>
> >>>> +static bool kfd_flush_tlb_after_unmap(struct kfd_dev *dev) {
> >>>> +     return KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 2)
> >>> Do we need to add a check for sdma ver >=8 here?
> >> What's the significance of version 8 for Aldebaran? This code was
> >> working on Aldebaran without a version check before. Did we ever
> >> publicly release an SDMA firmware older than version 8 that for Aldebaran?
> > We released v5 for Aldebaran SDMA in ROCm 4.5 . If I remember the ticket correctly, the
> same fix for Arcturus was required for Aldebaran and was part of SDMA v8. But Eric is
> obviously watching the ticket more closely than I, so I'll defer to him there.
> Yes. Aldebaran has the same bug as Arcturus in SDMA, but the bug doesn't
> cause GPU hang on Aldebaran. As Felix said heavy-weight TLB flush have
> been working on Aldebaran since it was enabled, so we don't need to
> check the version for it.

Ah perfect, thanks for the clarification!

 Kent

>
> Regards,
> Eric
> >
> >   Kent
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>    Felix
> >>
> >>
> >>> ||
> >>>> +            (KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 1) &&
> >>>> +             dev->adev->sdma.instance[0].fw_version >= 18);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>>   static int kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu(struct file *filep,
> >>>>                                         struct kfd_process *p, void
> >>> *data)
> >>>>   {
> >>>> @@ -1692,7 +1698,7 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu(struct
> >>> file *filep,
> >>>>         }
> >>>>
> >>>>         /* Flush TLBs after waiting for the page table updates to
> >>> complete */
> >>>> -     if (table_freed) {
> >>>> +     if (table_freed || !kfd_flush_tlb_after_unmap(dev)) {
> >>>>                 for (i = 0; i < args->n_devices; i++) {
> >>>>                         peer = kfd_device_by_id(devices_arr[i]);
> >>>>                         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!peer))
> >>>> @@ -1806,7 +1812,7 @@ static int
> >>> kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu(struct file *filep,
> >>>>         }
> >>>>         mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
> >>>>
> >>>> -     if (KFD_GC_VERSION(dev) == IP_VERSION(9, 4, 2)) {
> >>>> +     if (kfd_flush_tlb_after_unmap(dev)) {
> >>>>                 err = amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_sync_memory(dev->adev,
> >>>>                                 (struct kgd_mem *) mem, true);
> >>>>                 if (err) {



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list