[PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: skip SMU FW reloading in runpm BACO case
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon Jul 11 15:29:06 UTC 2022
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 9:58 AM Guchun Chen <guchun.chen at amd.com> wrote:
>
> SMU is always alive, so it's fine to skip SMU FW reloading
> when runpm resumed from BACO, this can avoid some race issues
> when resuming SMU FW.
>
> Suggested-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> index e9411c28d88b..9f17235bab83 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_psp.c
> @@ -2348,6 +2348,12 @@ static int psp_load_smu_fw(struct psp_context *psp)
> &adev->firmware.ucode[AMDGPU_UCODE_ID_SMC];
> struct amdgpu_ras *ras = psp->ras_context.ras;
>
> + /* Skip SMU FW reloading in case of using BACO for runpm,
> + * as SMU is always alive.
> + */
> + if (adev->in_runpm && amdgpu_asic_supports_baco(adev))
> + return 0;
What is an asic supports both BACO and BOCO? I think we need to
differentiate here.
Alex
> +
> if (!ucode->fw || amdgpu_sriov_vf(psp->adev))
> return 0;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list