[PATCH 16/31] drm/amd/display: refactor function transmitter_to_phy_id

Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao Rodrigo.Siqueira at amd.com
Mon Jun 20 15:32:41 UTC 2022



On 2022-06-17 15:51, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
> 
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 03:34:57PM -0400, Rodrigo Siqueira wrote:
>> From: Nicholas Choi <Nicholas.Choi at amd.com>
>>
>> [Why & How]
>> Since we only need transmitter value in function transmitter_to_phy_id().
>> Replace argument struct dc_link with enum transmitter.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao-kai Wang <Stylon.Wang at amd.com>
>> Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu at amd.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas at amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor at gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> 
> How did I end up in the signoff chain for a patch I have never seen up
> until this point? That should definitely be cleaned up.
> 
> Additionally, this commit message doesn't really seem to line up with
> the change. It says that "struct dc_link" is being replaced with "enum
> transmitter", when it is really the reverse, and that only the
> transmitter value is needed, which is already the case, right? I guess
> this is so that you can use DC_ERROR(), which requires a dc_ctx
> variable? It is not immediately obvious from the commit message so that
> should be clarified as well.

Hi Nathan,

Thanks for reporting this error; it looks like our scripts have some 
issues. I'll take a look at that.

About this patch, I'll drop it.

Thanks
Siqueira

> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c | 10 ++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
>> index 43b55bc6e2db..58882d42eff5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_link.c
>> @@ -3185,8 +3185,11 @@ bool dc_link_get_psr_state(const struct dc_link *link, enum dc_psr_state *state)
>>   }
>>   
>>   static inline enum physical_phy_id
>> -transmitter_to_phy_id(enum transmitter transmitter_value)
>> +transmitter_to_phy_id(struct dc_link *link)
>>   {
>> +	struct dc_context *dc_ctx = link->ctx;
>> +	enum transmitter transmitter_value = link->link_enc->transmitter;
>> +
>>   	switch (transmitter_value) {
>>   	case TRANSMITTER_UNIPHY_A:
>>   		return PHYLD_0;
>> @@ -3213,8 +3216,7 @@ transmitter_to_phy_id(enum transmitter transmitter_value)
>>   	case TRANSMITTER_UNKNOWN:
>>   		return PHYLD_UNKNOWN;
>>   	default:
>> -		WARN_ONCE(1, "Unknown transmitter value %d\n",
>> -			  transmitter_value);
>> +		DC_ERROR("Unknown transmitter value %d\n", transmitter_value);
>>   		return PHYLD_UNKNOWN;
>>   	}
>>   }
>> @@ -3331,7 +3333,7 @@ bool dc_link_setup_psr(struct dc_link *link,
>>   	psr_context->phyType = PHY_TYPE_UNIPHY;
>>   	/*PhyId is associated with the transmitter id*/
>>   	psr_context->smuPhyId =
>> -		transmitter_to_phy_id(link->link_enc->transmitter);
>> +		transmitter_to_phy_id(link);
>>   
>>   	psr_context->crtcTimingVerticalTotal = stream->timing.v_total;
>>   	psr_context->vsync_rate_hz = div64_u64(div64_u64((stream->
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list