[PATCH v3] drm/amdgpu: add workarounds for VCN TMZ issue on CHIP_RAVEN
Lang Yu
Lang.Yu at amd.com
Wed Mar 16 01:27:36 UTC 2022
On 03/15/ , Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Lang,
>
>
> Am 14.03.22 um 03:45 schrieb Lang Yu:
>
> Thank you for your patch. A shorter commit message summary would be:
>
> > drm/amdgpu: Work around VNC TMZ issue on CHIP_RAVEN
>
> > It is a hardware issue that VCN can't handle a GTT
> > backing stored TMZ buffer on CHIP_RAVEN series ASIC.
>
> Where is that documented, and how can this be reproduced?
It is documented in AMD internal Confluence and JIRA.
Secure playback with a low VRAM config(thus TMZ buffer
will be allocted in GTT domain) may reproduce this issue.
> > Move such a TMZ buffer to VRAM domain before command
> > submission as a wrokaround.
>
> workaround
>
> Please use a text width of 75 characters per line.
Thanks for your comments. I will take care about this.
> > v2:
> > - Use patch_cs_in_place callback.
> >
> > v3:
> > - Bail out early if unsecure IBs.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <Lang.Yu at amd.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c
> > index 7bbb9ba6b80b..1ac9e06d3a4d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v1_0.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #include <linux/firmware.h>
> > #include "amdgpu.h"
> > +#include "amdgpu_cs.h"
> > #include "amdgpu_vcn.h"
> > #include "amdgpu_pm.h"
> > #include "soc15.h"
> > @@ -1905,6 +1906,75 @@ static const struct amd_ip_funcs vcn_v1_0_ip_funcs = {
> > .set_powergating_state = vcn_v1_0_set_powergating_state,
> > };
> > +/*
> > + * It is a hardware issue that VCN can't handle a GTT TMZ buffer on
> > + * CHIP_RAVEN series ASIC. Move such a GTT TMZ buffer to VRAM domain
> > + * before command submission as a workaround.
> > + */
> > +static int vcn_v1_0_validate_bo(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *parser,
> > + struct amdgpu_job *job,
> > + uint64_t addr)
> > +{
> > + struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
> > + struct amdgpu_fpriv *fpriv = parser->filp->driver_priv;
> > + struct amdgpu_vm *vm = &fpriv->vm;
> > + struct amdgpu_bo_va_mapping *mapping;
> > + struct amdgpu_bo *bo;
> > + int r;
> > +
> > + addr &= AMDGPU_GMC_HOLE_MASK;
> > + if (addr & 0x7) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("VCN messages must be 8 byte aligned!\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mapping = amdgpu_vm_bo_lookup_mapping(vm, addr/AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SIZE);
> > + if (!mapping || !mapping->bo_va || !mapping->bo_va->base.bo)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + bo = mapping->bo_va->base.bo;
> > + if (!(bo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_ENCRYPTED))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM);
> > + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
> > + if (r) {
> > + DRM_ERROR("Failed validating the VCN message BO (%d)!\n", r);
>
> to validate
>
> > + return r;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return r;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vcn_v1_0_ring_patch_cs_in_place(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
> > + struct amdgpu_job *job,
> > + struct amdgpu_ib *ib)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t msg_lo = 0, msg_hi = 0;
> > + int i, r;
>
> Use unsigned int for the counter variable?
You can see both signed and unsigned are used in kernel.
(e.g., mm/page_alloc.c).
For this case, I think it makes no difference.
In a word, we should consider the specific context.
Regards,
Lang
> > +
> > + if (!(ib->flags & AMDGPU_IB_FLAGS_SECURE))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ib->length_dw; i += 2) {
> > + uint32_t reg = amdgpu_ib_get_value(ib, i);
> > + uint32_t val = amdgpu_ib_get_value(ib, i + 1);
> > +
> > + if (reg == PACKET0(p->adev->vcn.internal.data0, 0)) {
> > + msg_lo = val;
> > + } else if (reg == PACKET0(p->adev->vcn.internal.data1, 0)) {
> > + msg_hi = val;
> > + } else if (reg == PACKET0(p->adev->vcn.internal.cmd, 0)) {
> > + r = vcn_v1_0_validate_bo(p, job,
> > + ((u64)msg_hi) << 32 | msg_lo);
> > + if (r)
> > + return r;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct amdgpu_ring_funcs vcn_v1_0_dec_ring_vm_funcs = {
> > .type = AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_VCN_DEC,
> > .align_mask = 0xf,
> > @@ -1914,6 +1984,7 @@ static const struct amdgpu_ring_funcs vcn_v1_0_dec_ring_vm_funcs = {
> > .get_rptr = vcn_v1_0_dec_ring_get_rptr,
> > .get_wptr = vcn_v1_0_dec_ring_get_wptr,
> > .set_wptr = vcn_v1_0_dec_ring_set_wptr,
> > + .patch_cs_in_place = vcn_v1_0_ring_patch_cs_in_place,
> > .emit_frame_size =
> > 6 + 6 + /* hdp invalidate / flush */
> > SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_WREG * 6 +
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list