[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: suppress compile warnings
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Mon May 30 07:11:44 UTC 2022
Am 30.05.22 um 08:50 schrieb Evan Quan:
> Suppress the compile warnings below:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c:1407:12: warning:
> stack frame size (1040) exceeds limit (1024) in 'smu_v13_0_7_get_power_profile_mode' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c:1986:6: warning:
> no previous prototype for function 'gfx_v11_0_rlc_stop' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan at amd.com>
> Change-Id: I679436c91cb98afb9fcbef8942fd90a17e5234b5
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> index 8c0a3fc7aaa6..cb581cfc7464 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c
> @@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_init_csb(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void gfx_v11_0_rlc_stop(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> +static void gfx_v11_0_rlc_stop(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> {
> u32 tmp = RREG32_SOC15(GC, 0, regRLC_CNTL);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
> index 4e1861fb2c6a..8fd7652ae883 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/smu13/smu_v13_0_7_ppt.c
> @@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ static int smu_v13_0_7_get_power_limit(struct smu_context *smu,
>
> static int smu_v13_0_7_get_power_profile_mode(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf)
> {
> - DpmActivityMonitorCoeffIntExternal_t activity_monitor_external[PP_SMC_POWER_PROFILE_COUNT];
> + DpmActivityMonitorCoeffIntExternal_t *activity_monitor_external;
> uint32_t i, j, size = 0;
> int16_t workload_type = 0;
> int result = 0;
> @@ -1414,6 +1414,11 @@ static int smu_v13_0_7_get_power_profile_mode(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf
> if (!buf)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + activity_monitor_external = kzalloc(sizeof(DpmActivityMonitorCoeffIntExternal_t) * PP_SMC_POWER_PROFILE_COUNT,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
The static checkers will warn about that as well. Please use
kcalloc(sizeof(...), count, GFP_KERNEL);
Apart from that looks good to me.
Regards,
Christian.
> + if (!activity_monitor_external)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, " ");
> for (i = 0; i <= PP_SMC_POWER_PROFILE_WINDOW3D; i++)
> size += sysfs_emit_at(buf, size, "%-14s%s", amdgpu_pp_profile_name[i],
> @@ -1426,14 +1431,17 @@ static int smu_v13_0_7_get_power_profile_mode(struct smu_context *smu, char *buf
> workload_type = smu_cmn_to_asic_specific_index(smu,
> CMN2ASIC_MAPPING_WORKLOAD,
> i);
> - if (workload_type < 0)
> + if (workload_type < 0) {
> + kfree(activity_monitor_external);
> return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> result = smu_cmn_update_table(smu,
> SMU_TABLE_ACTIVITY_MONITOR_COEFF, workload_type,
> (void *)(&activity_monitor_external[i]), false);
> if (result) {
> dev_err(smu->adev->dev, "[%s] Failed to get activity monitor!", __func__);
> + kfree(activity_monitor_external);
> return result;
> }
> }
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list