[PATCH] drm/amd/display: rewrite the check for mods
Jiasheng Jiang
jiasheng at iscas.ac.cn
Sat Nov 19 13:16:50 UTC 2022
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 15:56:09 +0800, Simon Ser wrote:
>> @@ -638,11 +638,14 @@ static int get_plane_modifiers(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned int plane_ty
>> return 0;
>>
>> *mods = kmalloc(capacity * sizeof(uint64_t), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!*mods)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>>
>> if (plane_type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) {
>> add_modifier(mods, &size, &capacity, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR);
>> add_modifier(mods, &size, &capacity, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID);
>> - return *mods ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> switch (adev->family) {
>> @@ -671,9 +674,6 @@ static int get_plane_modifiers(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned int plane_ty
>> /* INVALID marks the end of the list. */
>> add_modifier(mods, &size, &capacity, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID);
>>
>> - if (!*mods)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
> This breaks the "size" out-parameter.
No, it will not change the value of the "size".
The "size" can only be modified by add_modifier().
However, when the "*mods" is NULL, add_modifier() will return immediately,
without the execution of "*size += 1;".
Therefore, when the "*mods" is NULL, the rest of the function is useless,
which should be better to skip.
Jiang
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list