[PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: fix amdgpu_vm_pt_free warning
Philip Yang
yangp at amd.com
Mon Sep 12 13:59:48 UTC 2022
On 2022-09-09 16:01, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Am 2022-09-09 um 14:25 schrieb Philip Yang:
>> Free page table BO from vm resv unlocked context generate below
>> warnings.
>>
>> Add a free_work in vm_bo base of each page table BO, pass vm resv
>> unlock status from page table update caller, and schedule the
>> work if calling with vm resv unlocked.
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 3238 at
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:106 ttm_bo_set_bulk_move+0xa1/0xc0
>> Call Trace:
>> amdgpu_vm_pt_free+0x42/0xd0 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_vm_ptes_update+0x52d/0x850 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_vm_update_range+0x2a6/0x640 [amdgpu]
>> svm_range_unmap_from_gpus+0x110/0x300 [amdgpu]
>> svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x535/0x600 [amdgpu]
>> __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1cd/0x230
>> unmap_vmas+0x9d/0x140
>> unmap_region+0xa8/0x110
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1475 at
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c:483 dma_resv_iter_next
>> Call Trace:
>> dma_resv_iter_first+0x43/0xa0
>> amdgpu_vm_sdma_update+0x69/0x2d0 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_vm_ptes_update+0x29c/0x870 [amdgpu]
>> amdgpu_vm_update_range+0x2f6/0x6c0 [amdgpu]
>> svm_range_unmap_from_gpus+0x115/0x300 [amdgpu]
>> svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x510/0x5e0 [amdgpu]
>> __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1d3/0x230
>> unmap_vmas+0x140/0x150
>> unmap_region+0xa8/0x110
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang at amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h | 3 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> index 9ecb7f663e19..ac7cd2c738e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> @@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base {
>> /* protected by the BO being reserved */
>> bool moved;
>> +
>> + /* work to free pt bo if vm resv is not hold */
>> + struct work_struct free_work;
>> };
>> /* provided by hw blocks that can write ptes, e.g., sdma */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> index 88de9f0d4728..e6f6d7e6368f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor {
>> unsigned int level;
>> };
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work(struct work_struct *work);
>> +
>> /**
>> * amdgpu_vm_pt_level_shift - return the addr shift for each level
>> *
>> @@ -607,6 +609,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_pt_alloc(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> pt_bo = &pt->bo;
>> pt_bo->parent = amdgpu_bo_ref(cursor->parent->bo);
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base_init(entry, vm, pt_bo);
>> + INIT_WORK(&entry->free_work, amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work);
>> r = amdgpu_vm_pt_clear(adev, vm, pt, immediate);
>> if (r)
>> goto error_free_pt;
>> @@ -624,23 +627,46 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_pt_alloc(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> *
>> * @entry: PDE to free
>> */
>> -static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry, bool
>> unlocked)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_bo *shadow;
>> if (!entry->bo)
>> return;
>> +
>> + if (unlocked) {
>> + schedule_work(&entry->free_work);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> shadow = amdgpu_bo_shadowed(entry->bo);
>> if (shadow) {
>> ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&shadow->tbo, NULL);
>> amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
>> }
>> ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&entry->bo->tbo, NULL);
>> +
>> entry->bo->vm_bo = NULL;
>> list_del(&entry->vm_status);
>> amdgpu_bo_unref(&entry->bo);
>> }
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> + struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry;
>> + struct amdgpu_bo *root;
>> +
>> + entry = container_of(work, struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base, delayed_work);
>> +
>> + root = amdgpu_bo_ref(entry->vm->root.bo);
>> + amdgpu_bo_reserve(root, true);
>> +
>> + amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry, true);
>
> Doesn't this just cause the work to be scheduled again, rather than
> actually freeing the BO?
You are right, I will send v2 using Christian's suggestion to use a
single worker in the vm.
Thanks,
Philip
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
>> +
>> + amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
>> + amdgpu_bo_unref(&root);
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs - free PD/PT levels
>> *
>> @@ -652,16 +678,17 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
>> */
>> static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> - struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *start)
>> + struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *start,
>> + bool unlocked)
>> {
>> struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor cursor;
>> struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry;
>> for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, start, cursor, entry)
>> - amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry);
>> + amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry, unlocked);
>> if (start)
>> - amdgpu_vm_pt_free(start->entry);
>> + amdgpu_vm_pt_free(start->entry, unlocked);
>> }
>> /**
>> @@ -673,7 +700,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>> */
>> void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_root(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct
>> amdgpu_vm *vm)
>> {
>> - amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, vm, NULL);
>> + amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, vm, NULL, false);
>> }
>> /**
>> @@ -966,7 +993,8 @@ int amdgpu_vm_ptes_update(struct
>> amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>> if (cursor.entry->bo) {
>> params->table_freed = true;
>> amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, params->vm,
>> - &cursor);
>> + &cursor,
>> + params->unlocked);
>> }
>> amdgpu_vm_pt_next(adev, &cursor);
>> }
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list