[PATCH v3 1/1] drm/amdgpu: fix amdgpu_vm_pt_free warning

Philip Yang yangp at amd.com
Wed Sep 14 15:13:04 UTC 2022


On 2022-09-13 16:10, Felix Kuehling wrote:
> Am 2022-09-13 um 09:19 schrieb Philip Yang:
>> Free page table BO from vm resv unlocked context generate below
>> warnings.
>>
>> Add a pt_free_work in vm to free page table BO from vm->pt_freed list.
>> pass vm resv unlock status from page table update caller, and add vm_bo
>> entry to vm->pt_freed list and schedule the pt_free_work if calling with
>> vm resv unlocked.
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 3238 at
>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:106 ttm_bo_set_bulk_move+0xa1/0xc0
>> Call Trace:
>>   amdgpu_vm_pt_free+0x42/0xd0 [amdgpu]
>>   amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs+0xb3/0xf0 [amdgpu]
>>   amdgpu_vm_ptes_update+0x52d/0x850 [amdgpu]
>>   amdgpu_vm_update_range+0x2a6/0x640 [amdgpu]
>>   svm_range_unmap_from_gpus+0x110/0x300 [amdgpu]
>>   svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x535/0x600 [amdgpu]
>>   __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1cd/0x230
>>   unmap_vmas+0x9d/0x140
>>   unmap_region+0xa8/0x110
>>
>> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1475 at
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c:483 dma_resv_iter_next
>> Call Trace:
>>   dma_resv_iter_first+0x43/0xa0
>>   amdgpu_vm_sdma_update+0x69/0x2d0 [amdgpu]
>>   amdgpu_vm_ptes_update+0x29c/0x870 [amdgpu]
>>   amdgpu_vm_update_range+0x2f6/0x6c0 [amdgpu]
>>   svm_range_unmap_from_gpus+0x115/0x300 [amdgpu]
>>   svm_range_cpu_invalidate_pagetables+0x510/0x5e0 [amdgpu]
>>   __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x1d3/0x230
>>   unmap_vmas+0x140/0x150
>>   unmap_region+0xa8/0x110
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c    |  4 ++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h    |  6 +++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> index 59cac347baa3..27e6155053b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
>> @@ -2022,6 +2022,9 @@ int amdgpu_vm_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>       spin_lock_init(&vm->invalidated_lock);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm->freed);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm->done);
>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vm->pt_freed);
>> +    INIT_WORK(&vm->pt_free_work, amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work);
>> +    spin_lock_init(&vm->pt_free_lock);
>>         /* create scheduler entities for page table updates */
>>       r = drm_sched_entity_init(&vm->immediate, 
>> DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
>> @@ -2244,6 +2247,7 @@ void amdgpu_vm_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
>> struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>           amdgpu_vm_free_mapping(adev, vm, mapping, NULL);
>>       }
>>   +    cancel_work_sync(&vm->pt_free_work);
>>       amdgpu_vm_pt_free_root(adev, vm);
>>       amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
>>       amdgpu_bo_unref(&root);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> index 9ecb7f663e19..b77fe838c327 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.h
>> @@ -276,6 +276,11 @@ struct amdgpu_vm {
>>       /* BOs which are invalidated, has been updated in the PTs */
>>       struct list_head        done;
>>   +    /* PT BOs scheduled to free and fill with zero if vm_resv is 
>> not hold */
>> +    struct list_head    pt_freed;
>> +    struct work_struct    pt_free_work;
>> +    spinlock_t        pt_free_lock;
>> +
>>       /* contains the page directory */
>>       struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base     root;
>>       struct dma_fence    *last_update;
>> @@ -471,6 +476,7 @@ int amdgpu_vm_pde_update(struct 
>> amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>>   int amdgpu_vm_ptes_update(struct amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>>                 uint64_t start, uint64_t end,
>>                 uint64_t dst, uint64_t flags);
>> +void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work(struct work_struct *work);
>>     #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>>   void amdgpu_debugfs_vm_bo_info(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, struct 
>> seq_file *m);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> index 88de9f0d4728..c6f91731ecfb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
>> @@ -624,12 +624,22 @@ static int amdgpu_vm_pt_alloc(struct 
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>    *
>>    * @entry: PDE to free
>>    */
>> -static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
>> +static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry, bool 
>> unlocked)
>>   {
>>       struct amdgpu_bo *shadow;
>>         if (!entry->bo)
>>           return;
>> +
>> +    if (unlocked) {
>> +        spin_lock(&entry->vm->pt_free_lock);
>> +        list_move(&entry->vm_status, &entry->vm->pt_freed);
>> +        spin_unlock(&entry->vm->pt_free_lock);
>> +
>> +        schedule_work(&entry->vm->pt_free_work);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       shadow = amdgpu_bo_shadowed(entry->bo);
>>       if (shadow) {
>>           ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&shadow->tbo, NULL);
>> @@ -641,6 +651,29 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct 
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
>>       amdgpu_bo_unref(&entry->bo);
>>   }
>>   +void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +    struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry, *next;
>> +    struct amdgpu_vm *vm;
>> +    struct amdgpu_bo *root;
>> +    LIST_HEAD(pt_freed);
>> +
>> +    vm = container_of(work, struct amdgpu_vm, pt_free_work);
>> +
>> +    spin_lock(&vm->pt_free_lock);
>> +    list_splice_init(&vm->pt_freed, &pt_freed);
>> +    spin_unlock(&vm->pt_free_lock);
>> +
>> +    root = amdgpu_bo_ref(vm->root.bo);
>
> I'm not sure why you need this extra reference. If your concern is, 
> that the root bo could disappear while the worker is running, it could 
> disappear even before the worker started running. In that case, you 
> should take the reference before scheduling the work. But I think 
> cancel_work_sync in amdgpu_vm_fini protects you from that. Therefore I 
> believe there is no need to take an extra reference here.
>
Yes, with cancel_work_sync in amdgpu_vm_fini, we don't need take vm 
reference here. I will remove it and modify others commented by 
Christian, send out v5 patch.

Thanks,

Philip

> Other than that, the patch looks good to me.
>
> Regards,
>   Felix
>
>
>> +    amdgpu_bo_reserve(root, true);
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, &pt_freed, vm_status)
>> +        amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry, false);
>> +
>> +    amdgpu_bo_unreserve(root);
>> +    amdgpu_bo_unref(&root);
>> +}
>> +
>>   /**
>>    * amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs - free PD/PT levels
>>    *
>> @@ -652,16 +685,17 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct 
>> amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
>>    */
>>   static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>                     struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>> -                  struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *start)
>> +                  struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor *start,
>> +                  bool unlocked)
>>   {
>>       struct amdgpu_vm_pt_cursor cursor;
>>       struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry;
>>         for_each_amdgpu_vm_pt_dfs_safe(adev, vm, start, cursor, entry)
>> -        amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry);
>> +        amdgpu_vm_pt_free(entry, unlocked);
>>         if (start)
>> -        amdgpu_vm_pt_free(start->entry);
>> +        amdgpu_vm_pt_free(start->entry, unlocked);
>>   }
>>     /**
>> @@ -673,7 +707,7 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(struct 
>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>    */
>>   void amdgpu_vm_pt_free_root(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct 
>> amdgpu_vm *vm)
>>   {
>> -    amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, vm, NULL);
>> +    amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, vm, NULL, false);
>>   }
>>     /**
>> @@ -966,7 +1000,8 @@ int amdgpu_vm_ptes_update(struct 
>> amdgpu_vm_update_params *params,
>>                   if (cursor.entry->bo) {
>>                       params->table_freed = true;
>>                       amdgpu_vm_pt_free_dfs(adev, params->vm,
>> -                                  &cursor);
>> +                                  &cursor,
>> +                                  params->unlocked);
>>                   }
>>                   amdgpu_vm_pt_next(adev, &cursor);
>>               }


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list