[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Avoid possible buffer overflow
Christophe JAILLET
christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr
Mon Aug 21 06:47:51 UTC 2023
Le 21/08/2023 à 08:19, Su Hui a écrit :
> smatch error:
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c:1257 amdgpu_discovery_reg_base_init() error:
> testing array offset 'adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst' after use.
>
> change the assignment order to avoid buffer overflow.
>
> Fixes: c40bdfb2ffa4 ("drm/amdgpu: fix incorrect VCN revision in SRIOV")
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui at nfschina.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
> index 8e1cfc87122d..ba95526c3d45 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_discovery.c
> @@ -1250,11 +1250,12 @@ static int amdgpu_discovery_reg_base_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> * 0b10 : encode is disabled
> * 0b01 : decode is disabled
> */
> - adev->vcn.vcn_config[adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst] =
> - ip->revision & 0xc0;
> +
> ip->revision &= ~0xc0;
> if (adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst <
> AMDGPU_MAX_VCN_INSTANCES) {
> + adev->vcn.vcn_config[adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst] =
> + ip->revision & 0xc0;
Hi,
I don't think that the patch is correct.
Because of the "ip->revision &= ~0xc0" which is now above it,
"ip->revision & 0xc0" should now always be 0.
Maybe both lines should be moved within the "if"?
CJ
> adev->vcn.num_vcn_inst++;
> adev->vcn.inst_mask |=
> (1U << ip->instance_number);
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list