[PATCH (set 1) 00/20] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:

> 
> On 8/24/23 08:07, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > > > niggly little warnings.
> > > 
> > > The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward?
> > 
> > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0.
> > 
> > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@kernel.org/
> > 
> > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts.
> > 
> > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster
> > than I can squash them.  Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test
> > new patches on merge?
> 
> I guess on that note, do you know if there is a way to run
> `scripts/kernel-doc` on patches instead of whole files? That would make
> much easier to block new kernel-doc issues from appearing.

Not off hand.

When I run builds on patches I author, I run them twice concurrently.
Once on the commit I'm basing on and once on the HEAD of my patchset.  I
then diff the two.  So as long as the number of errors and warnings stay
the same or reduce, we're golden.

Perhaps the same method could be used with `kernel-doc`?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]