[RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices

[zhuweixi]

Thanks! I am planning to present GMEM in Linux MM Alignment Sessions so I can collect more input from the mm developers.

@Christian @Oak I will also send you invitations once a presentation is scheduled. :)

-Weixi

-----Original Message-----
From: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com> 
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 10:55 PM
To: zhuweixi <weixi.zhu at huawei.com>; Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com>; Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; akpm at linux-foundation.org; weixi.zhu at openeuler.sh; mgorman at suse.de; jglisse at redhat.com; rcampbell at nvidia.com; jhubbard at nvidia.com; apopple at nvidia.com; mhairgrove at nvidia.com; ziy at nvidia.com; alexander.deucher at amd.com; Xinhui.Pan at amd.com; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; Felix.Kuehling at amd.com; ogabbay at kernel.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org; jgg at nvidia.com; leonro at nvidia.com; zhenyuw at linux.intel.com; zhi.a.wang at intel.com; intel-gvt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nikula at linux.intel.com; joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com; rodrigo.vivi at intel.com; tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices

On 29.11.23 09:27, zhuweixi wrote:
> Glad to hear that more sharable code is desirable.
> IMHO, for a common MM subsystem, it is more beneficial for GMEM to 
> extend core MM instead of building a separate one.

More core-mm complexity, awesome, we all love that! ;)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb