[PATCH 6/6] drm/amdgpu: Do bo_va ref counting for KFD BOs
Felix Kuehling
felix.kuehling at amd.com
Mon Jan 16 22:58:43 UTC 2023
On 2023-01-16 17:12, Errabolu, Ramesh wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Comment inline.
>
> Regards,
> Ramesh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Chen, Xiaogang
> Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2023 4:28 AM
> To: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/amdgpu: Do bo_va ref counting for KFD BOs
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaogang Chen <Xiaoganng.Chen at amd.com>
>
> Regards
>
> Xiaogang
>
> On 1/11/2023 7:31 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> This is needed to correctly handle BOs imported into the GEM API,
>> which would otherwise get added twice to the same VM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> index df08e84f01d7..8b5ba2e04a79 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> @@ -370,9 +370,17 @@ static int amdgpu_amdkfd_bo_validate_and_fence(struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>> return ret;
>>
>> ret = amdgpu_amdkfd_bo_validate(bo, domain, true);
>> - if (!ret)
>> - dma_resv_add_fence(bo->tbo.base.resv, fence,
>> - DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unreserve_out;
>> +
>> + ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(bo->tbo.base.resv, 1);
> Ramesh: Could this stmt to reserve space for fence be applied in patch 4.
Done. Thanks for pointing this out.
Regards,
Felix
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unreserve_out;
>> +
>> + dma_resv_add_fence(bo->tbo.base.resv, fence,
>> + DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>> +
>> +unreserve_out:
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo);
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -785,6 +793,7 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
>> uint64_t va = mem->va;
>> struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment[2] = {NULL, NULL};
>> struct amdgpu_bo *bo[2] = {NULL, NULL};
>> + struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va;
>> bool same_hive = false;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> @@ -871,7 +880,12 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
>> pr_debug("Unable to reserve BO during memory attach");
>> goto unwind;
>> }
>> - attachment[i]->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo[i]);
>> + bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo[i]);
>> + if (!bo_va)
>> + bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo[i]);
>> + else
>> + ++bo_va->ref_count;
>> + attachment[i]->bo_va = bo_va;
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo[i]);
>> if (unlikely(!attachment[i]->bo_va)) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -895,7 +909,8 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
>> continue;
>> if (attachment[i]->bo_va) {
>> amdgpu_bo_reserve(bo[i], true);
>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_del(adev, attachment[i]->bo_va);
>> + if (--attachment[i]->bo_va->ref_count == 0)
>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_del(adev,
>> + attachment[i]->bo_va);
>> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo[i]);
>> list_del(&attachment[i]->list);
>> }
>> @@ -912,7 +927,8 @@ static void kfd_mem_detach(struct
>> kfd_mem_attachment *attachment)
>>
>> pr_debug("\t remove VA 0x%llx in entry %p\n",
>> attachment->va, attachment);
>> - amdgpu_vm_bo_del(attachment->adev, attachment->bo_va);
>> + if (--attachment->bo_va->ref_count == 0)
>> + amdgpu_vm_bo_del(attachment->adev, attachment->bo_va);
>> drm_gem_object_put(&bo->tbo.base);
>> list_del(&attachment->list);
>> kfree(attachment);
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list