[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Simplify same effect if/else blocks

Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz at amd.com
Fri Mar 3 21:11:21 UTC 2023


On 1/15/23 05:00, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> The if / else block code has same effect irrespective of the logical
> evaluation.  Hence, simply the implementation by removing the unnecessary
> conditional evaluation. While at it, also fix the long line checkpatch
> complaint. Issue identified using cond_no_effect.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch script.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv at mailo.com>

Applied, thanks!

> ---
> Please note: The proposed change is compile tested only. If there are any
> inbuilt test cases that I should run for further verification, I will appreciate
> guidance about it. Thank you.
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c | 11 +++--------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> index 0cb8d1f934d1..776209e5d21f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc.c
> @@ -3470,14 +3470,9 @@ static void commit_planes_for_stream(struct dc *dc,
>   		/* Since phantom pipe programming is moved to post_unlock_program_front_end,
>   		 * move the SubVP lock to after the phantom pipes have been setup
>   		 */
> -		if (should_lock_all_pipes && dc->hwss.interdependent_update_lock) {
> -			if (dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock)
> -				dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock(dc, context, false, should_lock_all_pipes, NULL, subvp_prev_use);
> -		} else {
> -			if (dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock)
> -				dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock(dc, context, false, should_lock_all_pipes, NULL, subvp_prev_use);
> -		}
> -
> +		if (dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock)
> +			dc->hwss.subvp_pipe_control_lock(dc, context, false, should_lock_all_pipes,
> +							 NULL, subvp_prev_use);
>   		return;
>   	}
>   

-- 
Hamza



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list